Jump to content

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 4 hours ago by ~2025-39075-80 in topic Talk:Main Page

Shortcut: COM:AN

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new section]
User problems
[new section]
Blocks and protections
[new section]
Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.

Archives
26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
126, 125, 124, 123, 122, 121, 120, 119, 118, 117, 116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

Note

  • Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
  • Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s). {{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN|thread=|reason=}} ~~~~ is available for this.
  • Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.


Re request Massive message request for WLE BR 2025 contributors

[edit]

Hi all, this is the secound time that I requesting, I need to send a request for feedback to the participants of the WLE BR 25, can you guys help me?

Preferable via "wikimail", if not possible, via their talk pages

Olá tudo bem?!

Queríamos agradecer sua participação no Wiki Loves Earth 2025! Se possível, estamos realizando uma pesquisa sobre o concurso para podermos melhorar para o ano que vem! Ela pode ser respondida de forma completamente anônima nesse link: link para a pesquisa, se possível, responder até o dia 30 de novembro!

Caso tenham alguma dúvida, contato@foto.wiki.br

Muito obrigado novamente, equipe foto.wiki.br

{{Rodrigo.Argenton/test}}

Thank you. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 12:37, 19 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Could you please make a separate page with a plain bulleted list of users (no table), then it would be much easier to send a mass message (which would land on the talk pages, I do not know how to mass-send e-mails). Also I guess the subject of the message is missing. Ymblanter (talk) 20:14, 25 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Ymblanter: here the list, the subject can be "Obrigado pela sua participação no Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2025!", thank you in advance. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 14:07, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
The list also needs to be formatted in the format described here: mw:Help:Extension:MassMessage. To avoid accidental inclusion of parts not intended for the message text please put the the text and the subject on a separate page. GPSLeo (talk) 15:11, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Ymblanter: The list of user talk pages is User:Rodrigo.Argenton/test. If you need that without " talk", please instead see User:Jeff G./list.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:40, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Looking at it Ymblanter (talk) 18:25, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
I sent the mass message to the queue, but it has not been delivered. I check in a few hours, and possibly send it again if needed, this happened in the past. Ymblanter (talk) 18:33, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
✓ Done. At the end, I had to reformat the list manually and spent about half an hour for that. Not sure it was a good investment of my time. Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 27 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I didn't get what was the problem, can you better clarify to avoid problems in the future? -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 09:10, 28 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Please look how User:Rodrigo.Argenton/test is now formatted. The mass message tool did not recognize the old format (it thought I am sending a message to zero users). Ymblanter (talk) 11:36, 28 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
You actually didn't include the link to the research. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 17:08, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
I guess this is your way of saying "thank you, you wasted a lot of your time because I did not care to read policies, and now you will waste more of your time". Sure, I will add it now by hand. Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
I’ve already made the adjustments, so there is no need to worry about it anymore. Thank you.
That said, I felt the annoyance directed at me was unfair. I was criticized for not knowing a tool I don't use, and don't have access, yet it seems you aren't familiar with the proper tools either, which forced you to do the work manually.
Manual work that could have been avoided... I recommend using GSheets, OpenOffice Calc, or Excel to modify lists easily. I also suggest using volunteer-made scripts for mass editing, such as JS Wiki Browser. It took me 7 minutes to fix, and adapting the list to Meta’s recommendations would take about 5.
I didn't mean to cause any trouble; I only asked because I was offline and thought your access levels would make the job trivial.
Thanks for your time regardless. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 16:03, 3 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 16:08, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

BOKOBA veroly

[edit]

BOKOBA veroly (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Is there anyone who might be willing to take over from me on the interaction with BOKOBA veroly? Preferably this would be someone who has more than my minimal French, and ideally someone from Africa, since he has written, "It is easy for you, from the West, to make decisions about anything that deviates from the ordinary and comes from real Africa." I do not believe I am biased against him as an African, and I believe I would have blocked anyone for this level of copyright violations and failure to engage, but I would like to recuse myself based on the possibility that I was acting with cultural bias. - Jmabel ! talk 17:36, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I see that you did block this user for 6 months. It seems a bit harsh as a first block, specially because there are useful uploads. But I agree that at least a strong warning is needed. Yann (talk) 18:16, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Uploads that infringe copyright are generally not useful, but rather very harmful. Stepro (talk) 19:18, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Well, this comment is not useful. Did you check their uploads? Yann (talk) 19:20, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
I think it is.
Of course, I checked his uploads, which is why I posted the matter on the administrators' noticeboard: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 126#User:BOKOBA veroly
And I'm still waiting for his response as to how he was able to take photos in Potsdam, Germany, from Africa: User talk:BOKOBA veroly#File:Présentation en.jpg and File:Excellent.jpg
I actually believe that the sheer number of his uploads deleted due to copyright infringements speaks for itself. Stepro (talk) 19:35, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
I think you didn't understand what I wrote. Yes, there are copyright violations, but there are also useful uploads. So we usually do not apply a 6-month block the first time when the user is not a vandalism-only account. Yann (talk) 20:11, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
The problem is that we can not trust any own work claims of this user. GPSLeo (talk) 20:32, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
I'll try to communicate with them. I'm able to use French (I'm European, not African, though, but that shouldn't matter, I hope). Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 21:34, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I would reduce the block to one week. Hopefully that's sufficient to send the message through. Yann (talk) 16:18, 1 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Yann: then will you take it upon yourself to do something about his continued effort to contact me outside of Commons [1] [2] (the last of which I am about to delete without reading, but this link will let you find out whatever it says)? There have also been emails. In response to one of the latter I told him (in English and French) that the only acceptable place for him to continue this during his block is his user talk page, to which he continues to have access. He ignored that.
I would strongly object to him being unblocked without being assigned a mentor, and I would strongly request a mutual no-contact with myself to be a condition of the unblock. - Jmabel ! talk 16:58, 1 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
OK, fine. I will give him these requirements for unblocking. Yann (talk) 17:03, 1 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
I would suggest to change to partial block for uploads until the status of all files clarified. GPSLeo (talk) 17:24, 1 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
To whom it may concern but who's not able to understand French well: The linked EN-WP messages to @Jmabel are basically only a fact-centric defence (I didn't see things amounting to personal attacks) and explanation on how he (BOKOBA veroly) claimed to have produced (the second one: "Les photos signalées comme potentiellement en infraction sont mes propres créations, réalisées en partie avec mon téléphone personnel."; some apparently have been processed with Leonardo AI) some of the files in jeopardy. Additionally, he indeed asks for a mentoring guidance. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 21:58, 1 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
I propose extending his ban indefinitely due to his continued lies today about the authorship of the photos he uploaded: User talk:BOKOBA veroly#File:Présentation en.jpg and File:Excellent.jpg
He is lying to us completely brazenly, claiming to have taken the photos himself, even though he was demonstrably 4,700 km away from the scene. In my opinion, shortening the ban would be tantamount to supporting further copyright infringements. His statements in the above-mentioned discussion section also mean that this can no longer be considered a mistake, lack of knowledge, or other perhaps excusable behavior, but only willful and malicious deception. Stepro (talk) 17:36, 1 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Stepro: in that response you linked, BV posted a text with a boilerplate feeling (he posted it 3 times: in your thread, on Joe's EN talk page and below my DR notice at the bottom of the page), without exact correlation to the Wikicon images. He said "Mes images constituent en grande partie mon propre travail, certaines ayant été créées à l’aide de Leonardo AI." which translates to My images [read:uploads] are mostly my own work, some having been created with the assistance of Leonardo AI.". That's not a claim about the authorship of the Wikicon copyvios, only a general statement. With the other messages he posted, I don't think that he has any intent to lie or to deceive, that's more an impression of him being overwhelmed and confused but also willing to learn, if given the chance and assistance. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 22:06, 1 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
images I have taken =!= my own own images (that I have worked on myself, created with AI on my phone, downloaded to my phone). I still don't see a clear statement that he has taken the images, but only worked on them. This still lacks an understanding of what we want on Commons: own works or freely licensed images, and therefore I cannot support unblocking them for file upload. Best, —DerHexer (Talk) 08:11, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
I cannot support unblocking someone who contacted someone after being requested to stop, especially when they aren't indeffed. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:47, 3 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
What exactly is this that "deviates from the ordinary and comes from real Africa"? Some context? Trade (talk) 00:32, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Renatnom

[edit]

Renatnom (talk · contribs) behaviour is strange. When I add an uncreated category by HotCat, the account immediately creates blank category pages (before I have a chance to create the category page properly). I don't know if it's automated, but definitely it's not desirable. I've posted on the account's talkpage, but it would be good to check the situation. — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:18, 3 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

I've understand, don't worry. Thanks. Renatnom (talk) 08:20, 3 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Honor Magic V5.jpg

[edit]

Pls suppress the original image which contains copyrighted wallpaper. 0x0a (talk) 14:37, 3 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done GMGtalk 15:15, 3 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Request for review of mass deletion of my user project pages

[edit]

Hello,

I would kindly like to request a community review of several deletions performed by administrator The Squirrel Conspiracy, who used Nuke to mass-delete multiple pages in my user space under the criterion U3 (Inappropriate use of user pages).

These pages contained documented artistic and long-term photography projects, not drafts, vandalism, spam, nor external promotion. The pages were used to present my works, describe the concepts, show credits, and link to the projects as part of my artistic portfolio.

Examples:

No warning or discussion was provided before the mass deletion.

I kindly request:

  1. a review of whether these deletions fall under U3,
  2. consideration for restoring the deleted pages,
  3. clarification on appropriate use of user space for artistic projects.

Thank you very much for your time and help.

NikaSandler Nikasandler (talk) 23:31, 3 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

These were entirely appropriate deletions. Personal artistic projects and portfolios are outside the scope of commons. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:50, 3 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
User:Nikasandler/The World of Hedonia appears to have consisted entirely of a gallery of deleted images and some text about the context in which they were taken. That's pretty obviously out of scope, and does not encourage me to look at all the others. Can you point at any of these that are something more than that? - Jmabel ! talk 01:44, 4 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
My Nonhuman Friends seems to be a gallery of cat pictures, some should be in scope. AI paleoart was removed with request for deletions, but others were mass-deleted without any discussion? I think some cats could be undeleted if user stops presenting it as portfolio. MSDN.WhiteKnight (talk) 16:32, 5 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Rename request

[edit]

Can an admin handle the rename request for File:GsgshsgafaD (1).png? The file is cascade protected. Thanks. Geoffroi 01:31, 4 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done Abzeronow (talk) 02:20, 4 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Shaan SenguptaTalk 04:22, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

User contributions for Lk1155

[edit]

Moved to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User contributions for Lk1155 Nimbus227 (talk) 19:46, 5 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Shaan SenguptaTalk 04:22, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Picture of the Day 2025-12-06 description

[edit]

Current English description for the Picture of the Day 2025-12-06 contains factual mistake. Should be "Glotovo, Vladimir Oblast" instead of "Glotovo, Vologda Oblast". Someone please correct protected Template:Potd/2025-12-06 (en). Nyuhn (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done, thanks Ymblanter (talk) 18:17, 6 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Potential possibility of doxxing image

[edit]

Coud the image File:Bordello 38a.jpg fall under doxxing? Apologies, but I don't have the capacity to email about this and I'm unsure whether this would fall under doxxing or not. The reason why I think it might be is because it appears to be a private home/residence labelled "Well known venue for adult entertainment in the East Midlands" of which the user who uploaded it also appeared to categorise it under "Brothels in the United Kingdom". Obviously, we don't know how true it is and regardless of whether it is or not the resident/residents may not wish for it to be publicly known to be associated with such activities. If other users do think this falls under doxxing it would very much be appreciated if they could report it to reports@wikimedia.org. I would also like to know admins thoughts on whether this would fall under doxxing or not. Helper201 (talk) 22:52, 6 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

In any case, I've blocked and deleted. No productive contributions from that user. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:21, 6 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
I must say calling the file advertisement was an... interesting choice of deletion reason Trade (talk) 19:43, 7 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Not sure why you didn't just reported it to reports@wikimedia.org to start with Trade (talk) 19:41, 7 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Main Page

[edit]

The message on the page says it’s semi-protected, but it’s not anymore. It’s now autopatrol-protected. ~2025-39075-80 (talk) 04:53, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply