Commons:Quality images candidates

Shortcut

• COM:QIC

↓ Skip to nominations ↓

These are the candidates for becoming quality images. This is not the same thing as featured pictures. If you want informal feedback on your photos, please ask at Commons:Photography critiques.

Purpose

The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.

Guidelines

All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.

For nominators

Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.

Image page requirements

1. Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
3. Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
4. No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.

Creator

Proposed wording changes to specifically exclude AI generate media from being eligable for QI see discussion

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible unless the photographer is a Commons user. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Technical requirements

More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.

Resolution

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.

Image quality

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.

Composition and lighting

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.

Value

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.

How to nominate

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.

Number of nominations

No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.

Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.

Evaluating images

Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination. For an easier evaluation you can activate the gadget QICvote

When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.

How to review

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

• If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.

• If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.

Good voting practices

Shortcut

• COM:QICGVP

1. Do not have an image moved to consensual review ("Discuss") unless someone else added a vote with which you disagree.
2. If you think the image meets QI criteria, use "Promotion" right away.
3. If you think the image does not meet QI criteria and the issues cannot be solved, use "Decline" right away.
4. If instead you believe that the issues can be solved, leave a comment without changing the status (keep it as Nomination).
5. Do not add new votes under already promoted or declined images if you agree with the decision. The bot checks the date of the last comment, so this only delays the result.
6. If a comment raises an unresolved issue, promoting is generally considered impolite. Only promote if the issue is clearly minor, fixed, or incorrect - and say so briefly. If you’re not sure, add a comment (don't change status). Change to "Discuss" only once conflicting votes appear.

Grace period and promotion

If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

How to execute decision

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

Manual instructions (open only in cases of emergency)

If promoted,

1. Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
2. Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
3. Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 2025.
4. Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.

If declined,

1. move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 2025.

• Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
• Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
• Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 08 2025 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

Consensual review process

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.

Consensual review rules

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 09:54, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

• Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
• Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
• Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
• If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms

If you are not ready to Promote or Decline an image, you may leave a Comment instead.

If someone else has already promoted or declined an image and you disagree, you may cast an opposite voice or use Discuss — this will move the image to the Community Review section.

If you agree with a previous decision, there is no need to cast the same vote again, as doing so only delays the final closure of the nomination.

Please nominate no more than 5 images per day and try to review on average as many images as you nominate (check here to see how you are doing).

December 8, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Brown-hooded gull (Chroicocephalus maculipennis) --Charlesjsharp 09:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Brown-hooded gull (Chroicocephalus maculipennis) --Charlesjsharp 09:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Brown-hooded gull (Chroicocephalus maculipennis) with lobster --Charlesjsharp 09:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Pangalau 09:42, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brown-hooded gull (Chroicocephalus maculipennis) with lobster --Charlesjsharp 09:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Pangalau 09:42, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Kelp gull chasing Brown-hooded gull with lobster --Charlesjsharp 09:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Bryce Fullwood's Chevrolet Camaro Supercar at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final --Pangalau 09:18, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Nick Percat's Chevrolet Camaro Supercar at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final --Pangalau 09:18, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Helmet of Nick Percat at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final --Pangalau 09:18, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Helmet of Cameron Hill at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final --Pangalau 09:18, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Helmet of Jayden Ojeda at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final --Pangalau 09:18, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Valtra S416 tractor at Agritechnica 2023 --MB-one 09:03, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Pangalau 09:24, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1930 Ford Model A at ADAC Deutschland Klassik 2025 --MB-one 09:03, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Pangalau 09:24, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Cyclingworld Cyclocross Race 2024 --MB-one 09:03, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Regal motorboat at Interboot 2023 in Friedrichshafen, Germany --MB-one 09:03, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Joint SAR demonstration by the German Army and German Navy at ILA Berlin Air Show 2024 --MB-one 09:03, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Narrow-lined puffer​ (Arothron manilensis), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 07:01, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:04, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White-spotted puffer​ (Arothron hispidus), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 07:01, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:27, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black dotted sand perch (Parapercis millepunctata), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 07:01, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:27, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chinese trumpetfish (Aulostomus chinensis), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 07:01, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:45, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Orange-lined triggerfish (Balistapus undulatus), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 07:01, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:06, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Vienna, Freyung with church (the Schottenkirche), fountain (the Austrtiabrunnen) and two monumental bnuildings (the Schubladkastenhaus an the Schottenapothek) --Michielverbeek 07:00, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Vienna, tourist office at the Albertinaplatz --Michielverbeek 06:56, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Vienna, statue Erzherzog Albrecht-Denkmal auf der Albrechtsrampe designed by Caspar von Zumbusch --Michielverbeek 06:56, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:02, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Vienna, cathedral: Domkirche Sankt Stephan --Michielverbeek 06:56, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The door to the brotherhood's ossuary in the Useknovensky Rock Monastery. -- George Chernilevsky 06:52, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Remains of a destroyed internal wall in the Useknovensky Rock Monastery (2). -- George Chernilevsky 06:52, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination View of the Dniester River from the Useknovensky Rock Monastery -- George Chernilevsky 06:52, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:03, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Laugardælir church. By User:Jorchr --Earth605 06:38, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Good composition, but not sharp enough and a lot of noise. --XRay 06:46, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vieille bourse de Lille. By User:Chabe01 --Earth605 06:36, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:05, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Via Algarviana footpath near Silves, Portugal ( By User:Julesvernex2 --Earth605 06:36, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:01, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Arbutus canariensis in the Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo By User:Kenraiz --Earth605 06:36, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Left valve of a Tulip Mussel, Modiolus americanus --Llez 06:32, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rappbode Dam, Harz district, Germany --Llez 06:32, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:46, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rappbode Dam, Harz district, Germany --Llez 06:32, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:47, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Butterfly, Rappbode Dam, Harz district, Germany --Llez 06:32, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:44, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Butterfly, Rappbode Dam, Harz district, Germany --Llez 06:32, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:44, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pipe in the new waterworks in the southern corridor of Bamberg --Ermell 06:29, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:37, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pump in the new waterworks in Bamberg --Ermell 06:29, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:37, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pump in the new waterworks in Bamberg --Ermell 06:29, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:37, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clay pit Holzbachacker near Buttenheim with Schiessberg --Ermell 06:29, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:37, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clay pit Holzbachacker near Buttenheim with Schiessberg --Ermell 06:29, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:37, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Farol da Ponta do Pargo, Ponta do Pargo, Madeira, Portugal --XRay 06:09, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:27, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Artistically designed front door “Rua de Santa Maria 55” (The arT of oPEn doORs), Funchal, Madeira, Portugal --XRay 06:09, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:50, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boat in the harbour, Câmara de Lobos, Madeira, Portugal --XRay 06:09, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:34, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the Jardim Botânico da Madeira of the cable car to Monte, Santa Maria Maior, Madeira, Portugal --XRay 06:09, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:50, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Artistically designed front door “Rua de Santa Maria 66/68” (Emanuel Aguiar, The arT of oPEn doORs), Funchal, Madeira, Portugal --XRay 06:09, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Dijon (Côte-d'Or, France) - Liberation square in late afternoon light. On the left is the Palace of the Dukes and Estates of Burgundy --Benjism89 05:48, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Dijon (Côte-d'Or, France) - Former Saint Stephen church in late afternoon light --Benjism89 05:48, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:44, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Dijon (Côte-d'Or, France) - Former Saint Stephen church (right) and Saint Michael church (left) in late afternoon light --Benjism89 05:48, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Dijon (Côte-d'Or, France) - Timber-framed house at Vauban street 16 --Benjism89 05:48, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:09, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Dijon (Côte-d'Or, France) - Details of the facade of Vauban street 16 --Benjism89 05:48, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Crepidotus mollis
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:44, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flowering heather in heathland in Groote Zand nature reserve in Hooghalen Forestry.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:33, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Waltensburg/Vuorz Natural phenomenon? These clouds above the panoramic road Waltensburg/Vuorz to Breil/Brigels kept coming together to form a whole, only to fall apart again.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:45, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Hill fort of A Lanzada, Noalla, Sanxenxo, Galicia (Spain). --
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination View from Kudłacze towards Babia Góra, with mist-filled valleys below --Jakubhal 04:39, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Too much sky IMO (rule of thirds). But your photos are all excellent.--Lmbuga 05:05, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from below the mountain hut on Kudłacze --Jakubhal 04:39, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 05:05, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from below the mountain hut on Kudłacze --Jakubhal 04:39, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 05:03, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wooden cross on Sucha Polana in the Beskid Wyspowy mountains --Jakubhal 04:39, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 05:08, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Symbolic grave of Home Army soldiers on Łysina in the Beskid Wyspowy, fallen during the 1944 battle --Jakubhal 04:39, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 05:08, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Belltower of Saint Nicholas church in Litochoro, Central Macedonia, Greece. --Красный 04:17, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Substandard composition, no context for the tower / no size and position references to the church it is claimed it belongs to. --Grand-Duc 04:49, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Belltower of Saint Nicholas church in Litochoro, Central Macedonia, Greece. --Красный 04:17, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:40, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Nicholas church in Litochoro, Central Macedonia, Greece. --Красный 04:17, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:26, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Nicholas church in Litochoro, Central Macedonia, Greece. --Красный 04:17, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:41, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 04:47, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Nicholas church in Litochoro, Central Macedonia, Greece. --Красный 04:17, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:41, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination In the middle of "Schulterbach valley" nature reserve --Plozessor 04:14, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Again, wow! --Lmbuga 04:33, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Historic farmhouse in Mürsbach (Rattelsdorf) --Plozessor 04:14, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:26, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Garden pavillon on the city wall of Ebern --Plozessor 04:14, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 04:30, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "Reed bed" natural monument near Grettstadt --Plozessor 04:14, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Wov!!! --Lmbuga 04:25, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Krebsensee near Westheim (Knetzgau) --Plozessor 04:14, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very good quality. --Lmbuga 04:21, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main Post Office in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 03:52, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:15, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 24 Łukasińskiego Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 03:52, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 04:19, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 24 Łukasińskiego Street in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 03:52, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:15, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 24 Łukasińskiego Street in Kłodzko 3 --Jacek Halicki 03:52, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 04:19, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 24 Łukasińskiego Street in Kłodzko 5 --Jacek Halicki 03:52, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:56, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plaque at the entrance of St. Eugene Cemetery, Algiers --Bgag 03:33, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:54, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plaque in the monument to the rabbis who founded the Jewish community of Algiers, St. Eugene Cemetery, Algiers --Bgag 03:33, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:54, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cherchell Harbour, Algeria --Bgag 03:33, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:54, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ancient Roman fountain in Cherchell, Algeria --Bgag 03:33, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:54, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ancient Roman fountain in Cherchell, Algeria --Bgag 03:33, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:54, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture The City, Las Condes, Santiago. --Rjcastillo 03:12, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:16, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture The root will defeat the cement, Las Condes, Santiago. --Rjcastillo 03:12, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:34, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View along the several hundred coke ovens at the Zollverein coking plant in Essen, Germany. By User:GZagatta --Augustgeyler 02:50, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:02, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Morteratsch Glacier Ice Cave - 07. By User:Roy Egloff --Augustgeyler 02:50, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:02, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mittelsäger. By User:T meltzer --Augustgeyler 02:50, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:16, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination purple Flower. By User:Roy Egloff --Augustgeyler 02:50, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose The centre of the flower is very blurred. The edges are also blurred in general. There appears to be a hair on the right-hand petal (I can't even be sure because the definition isn't good). I don't see QI quality. --Lmbuga 04:51, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Cannobio Market - 05. By User:Roy Egloff --Augustgeyler 02:50, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Building at Markt 25 in Osnabrück, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 01:58, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 02:42, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Priesterseminar in Osnabrück, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 01:58, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:04, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town hall of Osnabrück, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 01:58, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:04, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Mary church in Osnabrück, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 01:58, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 02:42, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Peter cathedral in Osnabrück, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 01:58, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 02:42, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
     Comment I agree that it is QI. In my opinion, it is a photo that has been degraded by excessive perspective correction. I don't like it.--Lmbuga 03:11, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose I disagree, I'm sorry, but I find the tower looks too big-headed due to excessive perspective correction. --Lmbuga 05:19, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination San Pietro in Vincoli - esterno (by Rione I Monti) --Sebring12Hrs 01:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. After seeing this photo, I hope no one will say that shadows cannot be beautiful. It's surprising how tilted the building in the centre on the left is.--Lmbuga 01:49, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Mary of the People church in Rome (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 01:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 05:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roasted chestnuts vendor at dusk, Praça da Figueira, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 01:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 01:53, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red garden geranium (Pelargonium × hortorum) at sunset, Alameda Dom Afonso Henriques, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 01:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. I could ask myself whether I would promote this photo if it had been taken by someone other than you. But the only thing that is certain is that only you can take a photo like this. --Lmbuga 01:53, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portuguese fans watching Euro 2016 match with Cristiano Ronaldo on the giant screens, Alameda Afonso Henriques, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 01:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. I feel overwhelmed: I can't believe this photo is so good. --Lmbuga 01:59, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jeep Renegade Emergency Vehicle of Guardia di Finanza, Bozen --Aciarium 00:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Pangalau 09:24, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Berufsfeuerwehr/Landesnotrufzentrale, Bozen --Aciarium 00:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 02:01, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination West-View of Central Hospital Bozen --Aciarium 00:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Infectious Diseases Building of Zentralkrankenhaus Bozen --Aciarium 00:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 02:51, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ramp to Main Entrance of Zentralkrankenhaus Bozen --Aciarium 00:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:42, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

December 7, 2025

• 
  • Nomination White-fronted bee-eater (Merops bullockoides) --Hobbyfotowiki 00:15, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Nice bird, but not sharp enough for less than 3 megapixels. Poor quality IMO--Lmbuga 02:44, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mourning collared dove (Streptopelia decipiens --Hobbyfotowiki 00:15, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Lilac-breasted roller (Coracias caudatus) --Hobbyfotowiki 00:15, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. A bit underexposed perhaps --Lmbuga 02:04, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Speckled mousebird (Colius striatus) --Hobbyfotowiki 00:15, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support --Lmbuga 02:11, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Northern white-crowned shrike --Hobbyfotowiki 00:15, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The top of Lysaya Mountain near Selyavnoye-Vtoroye village, Voronezh region, Russia. By User:Саня Новиков --Екатерина Борисова 23:47, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The Charskie Peski tract: between the Kodar and Udokan ridges, Kalarsky District, Zabaikalsky Krai, Russia. By User:Ellebedeva --Екатерина Борисова 23:47, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Support Good quality. --Exciteddelirium 23:51, 7 December 2025 (UTC) -- Not eligible vote -- George Chernilevsky 08:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Chara sands against the backdrop of the Kodar Mountains, Zabaikalsky Krai, Russia. By User:Ted.ns --Екатерина Борисова 23:47, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Support Good quality. --Exciteddelirium 23:51, 7 December 2025 (UTC) -- Not eligible vote -- George Chernilevsky 08:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lakes of meteorite origin in the Vladimir oblast, Russia. By User:Ted.ns --Екатерина Борисова 23:47, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Support Good quality. Great content! --Exciteddelirium 23:50, 7 December 2025 (UTC) -- Not eligible vote -- George Chernilevsky 08:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Petunia in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:47, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Bird's-eye view of the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra in a morning mist, Kyiv, Ukraine. By User:KyivMax — NickK 23:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Swallow's Nest decorative castle, Haspra, AR Crimea. By User:Ryzhkov Oleksandr — NickK 23:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Comment Overprocessed IMO --Lmbuga 02:38, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bird's-eye view of the ruins of Borysthenes, the oldest Ancient Greek colony on the Northern shore of Black Sea, Berezan Island, Mykolaiv Oblast, Ukraine. By User:Oleg Marchuk — NickK 23:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:30, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the Chernihiv Fortress guns at sunrise, Chernihiv, Ukraine. By User:Alex Arendar — NickK 23:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:53, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A small iron coat of arms on the outer wall of the Useknovensky Rock Monastery. -- George Chernilevsky 22:16, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 22:40, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Remains of a destroyed internal wall in the Useknovensky Rock Monastery. -- George Chernilevsky 22:16, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 22:39, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Romanesco broccoli (Brassica oleracea) black and white -- George Chernilevsky 22:16, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Julian Lupyan 22:41, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 22:41, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ukrainian Navy artillery boat U170 Skadovs'k with a group of combat swimmers -- George Chernilevsky 22:16, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 22:39, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ukrainian Navy artillery boat U170 Skadovs'k with a group of combat swimmers (2) -- George Chernilevsky 22:16, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination ruddy darter (Sympetrum sanguineum) in Trebitz (Bad Schmiedeberg) --Romzig 21:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moth (Euclidia mi) on a clover flower in the Kröllwitz district of Halle (Saale), Germany --Romzig 21:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Left wing too blurred. Sorry. --Julian Lupyan 22:42, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination roe deer in a field in Kröllwitz in Halle (Saale), Germany --Romzig 21:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:39, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Villa Hamilton on Felseninsel Stein in Wörlitz Park --Romzig 21:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 21:48, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the Regenstein castle ruins near Blankenburg in the Harz Mountains --Romzig 21:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:40, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Bus station in Moscow --Perituss 19:47, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Mokhovaya Street in Moscow --Perituss 19:47, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    There's no FoP in Russia for modern murals, so you'd better crop it somehow to avoid the risk of deletion request.. --Екатерина Борисова 03:46, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gallery in Moscow --Perituss 19:47, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. I would say the lady walking by adds to the composition. --Julian Lupyan 22:43, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bus station in Moscow --Perituss 19:47, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 22:59, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Pashkov house in Moscow --Perituss 19:47, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Detail of the Monastery of San Xulián de Samos, Samos, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 19:46, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:05, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dacheng Hall in Mojiang Confucian Temple --瑞丽江的河水 19:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Borderline sharpness and PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 19:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Twin Stupas of Mengwo Central Temple (also known as Tree-wrapped Stupa) --瑞丽江的河水 19:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Borderline sharpness and PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 19:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lincang Railway Station --瑞丽江的河水 19:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Borderline sharpness and PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 19:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Honggui Mountain Tower --瑞丽江的河水 19:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Beatiful view, but the tower is not sharp, sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 03:48, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hongsheng Temple Pagoda --瑞丽江的河水 19:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 19:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Wrede passage --ArildV 18:09, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very nice. Try this photo as FP candidate --George Chernilevsky 21:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pristine abandoned dress shoes, Rovisco Pais Avenue, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 17:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:16, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Telephone booths converted into a public bookcase, Praça de Londres, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 17:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:16, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "Horas de Chumbo", by Rui Chafes, Parque das Nações, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 17:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:16, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pont-Neuf de Toulouse (by Kallerna) --Sebring12Hrs 17:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:16, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pont Valentre (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 17:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:20, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A mill on the shore of Zletovo River near the village of Kojkovo. --Kiril Simeonovski 14:50, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 15:47, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A waterfall on Jamišste River. --Kiril Simeonovski 14:50, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Wonderful place, but the image is very unsharp, sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 03:50, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An old house in the village of Strisovci. --Kiril Simeonovski 14:50, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 15:47, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A traditional house in the village of Bučište. --Kiril Simeonovski 14:50, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 15:47, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination This is a close-up shot of a person's lower legs and feet wearing dark, likely leather, boots on an asphalt or stone-chip pavementI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 14:43, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sharp and white balance is off --Jakubhal 15:10, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination This image appears to be a modern, multi-story building, perhaps still under construction or recently completed, with distinctive blue/cyan glass windows, standing near a body of water (a canal or river). The photo has a selective color/desaturated effect, emphasizing the blue glass.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 14:43, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Borderline sharpness, PC is needed.... --Sebring12Hrs 15:55, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination This image appears to be a modern, multi-story building, perhaps still under construction or recently completed, with distinctive blue/cyan glass windows, standing near a body of water (a canal or river). The photo has a selective color/desaturated effect, emphasizing the blue glass.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 14:43, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Bad crop, borderline sharpness, PC is needed.... --Sebring12Hrs 15:55, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A close-up photograph of a bright yellow sunflower (Helianthus annuus) in full bloom. The image clearly shows the detailed central disk and surrounding petals, with green foliage softly blurred in the background.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 14:43, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Subject not sharp, focus is on the leaf in the foreground, instead of flower --Jakubhal 15:59, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Not sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 16:08, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A close-up photograph of a bright yellow sunflower (Helianthus annuus) in full bloom. The image clearly shows the detailed central disk and surrounding petals, with green foliage softly blurred in the background.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 14:43, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 16:08, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Polish Aviation Museum, 39 Jana Pawła II Avenue, commemorative plaques, Cyżyny, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 14:28, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Polish Aviation Museum, 39 Jana Pawła II Avenue, Cyżyny, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 14:28, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination MiG-15, Polish Aviation Museum, 39 Jana Pawła II Avenue, commemorative plaques, Cyżyny, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 14:28, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:20, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Main Post Office in Kłodzko 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:38, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Some parts of statues are blown out. Fixable I hope. --Екатерина Борисова 03:59, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Main Post Office in Kłodzko 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:38, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Some parts of statues are blown out. Fixable I hope. --Екатерина Борисова 03:59, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main Post Office in Kłodzko 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:38, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:45, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Main Post Office in Kłodzko 4 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:38, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination 24 Łukasińskiego Street in Kłodzko by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:38, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:26, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moscow - 2025 - Restoration of the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour --Юрий Д.К. 11:19, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Wobbanight 12:12, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Moscow - 2025 - Maly Theatre --Юрий Д.К. 11:19, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Moscow - 2025 - Manezhnaya Square --Юрий Д.К. 11:19, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Right crop is not good IMO. --Екатерина Борисова 03:58, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moscow - 2025 - Details of the front door of the State Historical Museum --Юрий Д.К. 11:19, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Pdanese 12:56, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BMW M5 (G90) at MYLE Festival 2025 --Alexander-93 11:16, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 14:05, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Genesis G90 (RS4) at MYLE Festival 2025 --Alexander-93 11:16, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 14:05, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coscoroba swan (Coscoroba coscoroba) --Charlesjsharp 10:50, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 12:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crested caracaras (Caracara plancus) --Charlesjsharp 10:50, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Wobbanight 12:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crested caracaras (Caracara plancus) --Charlesjsharp 10:50, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 13:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crested caracara (Caracara plancus) --Charlesjsharp 10:50, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 11:08, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crested caracara (Caracara plancus) --Charlesjsharp 10:50, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 11:08, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BMW 316 E30 in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 09:33, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 10:01, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Caterham 7 275 R in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 09:33, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 21:26, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Chevrolet Caprice in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 09:33, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review Good quality. Warum aber sind die Bilder immer so plattgequetscht? -- Spurzem 09:50, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
    QI to me, but I agree with Spurzem; IMO a more natural look would look even better! --Aciarium 10:01, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meadow near the rugged Ebrach --Ermell 09:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 13:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meadow near the rugged Ebrach near Vorra --Ermell 09:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 13:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Rauhe Ebrach near Vorra --Ermell 09:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 11:20, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Residential building in Vorra --Ermell 09:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 09:34, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Residential building in Vorra --Ermell 09:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 10:01, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Madeira Sorrel in the Reserva Natural Especial del Chinyero close to the road TF-373 --FlocciNivis 09:20, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Wobbanight 13:59, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View on the road TF-24 at the Viewpoint of the Alto de Guamaso in La Orotava, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 09:20, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. More categories would be nice. --Aciarium 10:01, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Canary Juniper on a rock at the Mirador de Jardina with fog --FlocciNivis 09:20, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tree crown of a Canary Island Pine at the Mirador Pico de las Flores in El Rosario, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 09:20, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:01, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View from the harbor in Hamburg at the Norderelbe to the skyline with the church St. Michaelis --FlocciNivis 09:20, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Involvement of Montanuniversität Leoben in research networks --Aciarium 09:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Volkswagen Touran II of Austrian Finanzpolizei --Aciarium 09:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Dr. Josef-Schmölzer-Weg, Leoben --Aciarium 09:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Pdanese 13:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Leßmeyergasse, Leoben --Aciarium 09:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Proleber Straße, Leoben --Aciarium 09:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination View of Etablissements Dumortier, Hameau du Marais, in Blandain, Tournai, Belgium --Velvet 09:00, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 13:17, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Château Lassus, in Blandain, Tournai, Belgium --Velvet 08:59, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Strong support I love the composition, lighting, and the quality of this image. --Wobbanight 12:18, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door of 95b, Samarkandskaya Street, Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 08:56, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:02, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 95b, Samarkandskaya Street, Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 08:56, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    There are some dustspots on the sky that need to be removed --FlocciNivis 13:17, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
     Done, thanks for noticing. --Красный 17:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality now for me --FlocciNivis 19:10, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arkoy coast guard patrol ship in the port of Thessaloniki, Greece. --Красный 08:56, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Focus not on the main subject. Otherwise good photo! --Aciarium 10:01, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Subject issue --A S M Jobaer 14:45, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arch gates in the wall of the citadel near the Trigonion tower. Thessaloniki, Greece. --Красный 08:56, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:47, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Nicholas church in Litochoro, Central Macedonia, Greece. --Красный 08:56, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose CAs everywhere. --Sebring12Hrs 21:47, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cushion star (Culcita novaeguineae), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 08:54, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 13:18, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Anna's magnificent sea slug (Chromodoris annae), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 08:54, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 14:46, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Valentin's sharpnose puffer (Canthigaster valentini), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 08:54, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 11:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Feather star squat lobster (Allogalathea elegans), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 08:54, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Striped eel catfish​ (Plotosus lineatus), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 08:54, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 4-6 Grunwaldzka Street in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 08:42, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Only weathervane is in focus here, so maybe you'd change the decription and add proper categories. --Екатерина Борисова 04:05, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main Post Office in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:42, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:27, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Main Post Office in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:42, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Main Post Office in Kłodzko 3 --Jacek Halicki 08:42, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Main Post Office in Kłodzko 4 --Jacek Halicki 08:42, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 13:19, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dijon (Côte-d'Or, France) - Saint Michael church - Choir --Benjism89 07:57, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 14:46, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dijon (Côte-d'Or, France) - Saint Michael church - 15th-century Entombment of Christ --Benjism89 07:57, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 11:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dijon (Côte-d'Or, France) - Saint Michael church - 15th-century Entombment of Christ --Benjism89 07:57, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Pdanese 13:06, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dijon (Côte-d'Or, France) - Saint Michael church - 1699 pipe organ --Benjism89 07:57, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:56, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dijon (Côte-d'Or, France) - Saint Michael church - Tympanum and trumeau of the main portal --Benjism89 07:57, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 08:44, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flower of a strelitzia (Strelitziaceae), Jardim Botânico da Madeira, Santa Maria Maior, Madeira, Portugal --XRay 07:41, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:45, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Artistically designed front door “Rua de Santa Maria 77” (Marcos Milewski, The arT of oPEn doORs), Funchal, Madeira, Portugal --XRay 07:41, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:45, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Laurel trees (Ocotea foetens) in the laurel forest “Fanal”, Madeira, Portugal --XRay 07:41, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:37, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 14:46, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rock formation “Ilheus da Rib”, Ribeira da Janela, Madeira, Portugal --XRay 07:41, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:24, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rocks on the coast, Ribeira da Janela, Madeira, Portugal --XRay 07:41, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:45, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moscow. Khimki Reservoir. North River Terminal --Alexxx1979 07:40, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 11:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moscow. Moskva river. Kotelnicheskaya Embankment Building --Alexxx1979 07:40, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 11:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vienna-Landstraße, the Belvedere Schloss Garten --Michielverbeek 06:46, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vienna-Landstraße, the Belvedere Schloss Garten --Michielverbeek 06:46, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 08:42, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vienna, monumental building on Schwarzenbergplatz --Michielverbeek 06:46, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 08:42, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Vienna-Wieden, church (Karlskirche) from the Kreuzherrengasse-Hoyosgasse --Michielverbeek 06:46, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Vienna, monumental building: the Wiener Staatsoper --Michielverbeek 06:46, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sharp enough, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 19:28, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Right valve of a Tulip Mussel, Modiolus americanus --Llez 06:36, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:09, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Solitaire - observation tower and Double zip line, Rappbode Dam, Harz district, Germany --Llez 06:36, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:51, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Double zip line, Rappbode Dam, Harz district, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany --Llez 06:36, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:11, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1811 residential house in Ebern --Plozessor 05:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The "middle wayside shrine" cultural heritage monument in front of the "service tree at the middle wayside shrine" natural monument near Grettstadt --Plozessor 05:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 08:43, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wayside shrine near Dampfach --Plozessor 05:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quslity --Michielverbeek 06:53, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wooden apple and woodpecker above the entrance to "Natour Hassberge" nature experience trail --Plozessor 05:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:39, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stained-glass window with Saint John in Saint Anne church in Neuschleichach --Plozessor 05:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality but photo needs a vertical correction on the right side.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:35, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
    @Agnes Monkelbaan: You're right, fixed now. --Plozessor 09:51, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
    Bedankt --Agnes Monkelbaan 17:42, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ruinaulta (Rijnkloof Rheinschlucht) from Valendas to Castrisch. Steep rock face above the Vorderrhein.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:39, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Breil-Brigels Reservoir Lag da Breil.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:39, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Breil-Brigels View of the flanks of the Anterior Rhine.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    This is pretty grainy for an ISO 100 picture in bright daylight ... --Plozessor 05:29, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
    * Done. Noise Reduction Thank you for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)Good quality. --Llez 06:39, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shinjuku Gyoen National Garden, Tokyo --Jakubhal 04:39, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Pangalau 04:50, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stone lantern in Shinjuku Gyoen National Garden, Tokyo --Jakubhal 04:39, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Pangalau 04:50, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hiking trail in the Lubomir-Łysina Range, Beskid Wyspowy Mountains --Jakubhal 04:39, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Pangalau 04:50, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain Hut on Kudłacze, Beskid Wyspowy Mountains --Jakubhal 04:39, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Pangalau 04:50, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hiking trail in the Lubomir-Łysina Range, Beskid Wyspowy Mountains --Jakubhal 04:39, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Pangalau 04:50, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Círculo Sculpture, Las Condes. --Rjcastillo 04:30, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:45, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture The beauty of a city mineral, according to Olivia (2014), Las Condes. --Rjcastillo 04:30, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:45, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture Living Space, Las Condes. --Rjcastillo 04:30, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Citè Sculpture, Las Condes. --Rjcastillo 04:30, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:43, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Abatible Urbano Sculpture, Las Condes. --Rjcastillo 04:30, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:43, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Thomas Randle's Ford Mustang Supercar at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final --Pangalau 04:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Anton de Pasquale's Chevrolet Camaro Supercar at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final --Pangalau 04:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:32, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ryan Wood's Ford Mustang Supercar at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final --Pangalau 04:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:42, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Andre Heimgartner's Chevrolet Camaro Supercar at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final --Pangalau 04:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs PC IMO --Aciarium 09:54, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brodie Kostecki's Ford Mustang Supercar at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final --Pangalau 04:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:32, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brickyard in Aghlad, Algeria --Bgag 03:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:55, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ksar Aghlad, Algeria --Bgag 03:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:41, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ksar Aghlad, Algeria --Bgag 03:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ksar Aghlad, Algeria --Bgag 03:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:41, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ksar Aghlad, Algeria --Bgag 03:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:27, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building at Hohe Straße 22 in Quedlinburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. --Tournasol7 01:57, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building at Hohe Straße 29 in Quedlinburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. --Tournasol7 01:57, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:40, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building at Hoken 1 in Quedlinburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. --Tournasol7 01:57, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Very nice light. --Augustgeyler 03:40, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building at Finkenherd 3 in Quedlinburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. --Tournasol7 01:57, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:16, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building at Hohe Straße 19 in Quedlinburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. --Tournasol7 01:57, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    The windows on each floor are turned at a different angle, and so is the inscription. It looks very strange. --Екатерина Борисова 03:32, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:57, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Macro photo of a Pinguicula pumila flower --Alexander_Abair 01:52, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Small and very blurry. --Екатерина Борисова 03:28, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Macro photo of immature nutlets on Trichostema dichotomum --Alexander_Abair 01:52, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, too noisy and too low DoF with already borderline resolution. --Plozessor 05:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mature Matelea floridana fruit --Alexander_Abair 01:52, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Small and unsharp. --Екатерина Борисова 03:30, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Budding inflorescence of Physostegia virginiana against a dark background --Alexander_Abair 01:52, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Support Good quality. --Exciteddelirium 18:53, 7 December 2025 (UTC) -- Not eligible vote -- George Chernilevsky 08:32, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mycoheterotrphic Allotropa emerging from duff --Alexander_Abair 01:52, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Support Good quality and composition. The subject is clearly visible, and the photo quality is good. --Exciteddelirium 18:53, 7 December 2025 (UTC) -- Not eligible vote -- George Chernilevsky 08:32, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Street Art, Chemnitz. By User:Dirk Liesch --Augustgeyler 01:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 02:09, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Street Art 2, Chemnitz. By User:Dirk Liesch --Augustgeyler 01:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 02:09, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Filmcasino, Vienna. By User:Funke --Augustgeyler 01:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 02:09, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail, Altes Rathaus, Wilsdruff. By User:Ies --Augustgeyler 01:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pilot at the Airshow in Bex, Switzerland. By User:Roy Egloff --Augustgeyler 01:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 02:09, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fragment of the Mandelbrot set Image --Aokoroko 00:58, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 21:26, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fragment of the Mandelbrot set Image --Aokoroko 00:58, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 21:26, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fragment of the Mandelbrot set Image --Aokoroko 00:58, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 21:26, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fragment of the Mandelbrot set Image --Aokoroko 00:58, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:20, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fragment of the Mandelbrot set Image --Aokoroko 00:58, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 15:48, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Great blue heron, Wethersfield Cove, Wethersfield, CT USA --Pdanese 00:44, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 02:14, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ruby-throated hummingbird, Bafflin Audubon Sanctuary, Pomfret, CT USA --Pdanese 00:44, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Song sparrow, Hockanum Reservoir, East Hartford, CT USA --Pdanese 00:44, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 02:14, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tree swallow, Keeney Cove, Glastonbury, CT USA --Pdanese 00:44, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:27, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common yellowthroat, Pleasant Valley Wildlife Sanctuary, Lenox, MA USA --Pdanese 00:44, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:46, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

December 6, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Resurrection cathedral in Staraya Russa, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:47, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Street and former Real school building in Staraya Russa, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:47, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:58, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former women gymnasium in Staraya Russa, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:47, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, but  Level of detail too low: The building has no texture. Additionally the sky has colour banding. --Augustgeyler 00:02, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
    I don't really understand what texture a freshly painted and newly plastered building should have, but I won't argue. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:39, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Soviet residential building in Staraya Russa, Russia. By User:Stolbovsky --Екатерина Борисова 23:47, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 00:11, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Staraya Russa. Former synagogue building. By User:Alexxx1979 --Екатерина Борисова 23:47, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 00:02, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Bird's-eye view of the Palace and Park of Grokholsky in Voronovytsia, Vinnytsia Oblast, Ukraine. By User:Oleksandr Malyon — NickK 23:35, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Drone view of the Catherine's Church and surrounding blocks in October 2020, Chernihiv, Ukraine. By User:KyivMax — NickK 23:35, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Nave of the Church of the Assumption in Novoselytsia, the smallest wooden Gothic church in Zakarpattia Oblast, Ukraine. By User:Юрій Крилівець — NickK 23:35, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination The ornate carved wooden staircase with a red carpet inside the historic House of Scientists in Lviv, Ukraine. By User:Vadiko~ruwiki — NickK 23:35, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Alexander_Abair 02:19, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View of the Church of the Dormition from a nearby mountain, Osynove, Luhansk Oblast, Ukraine. Unedited photo. By User:Yosyanu — NickK 23:35, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Borovitskaya square in Moscow --Perituss 23:32, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Bus station in Moscow --Perituss 23:32, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 03:43, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bydgoszcz seen from the water tower at 1 Filarecka Street --Igor123121 22:53, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Photo shows the autumn of the town, but a bit more sky would have been better. Imo good enough for QI --Michielverbeek 07:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Bydgoszcz seen from the water tower at 1 Filarecka Street --Igor123121 22:53, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Bydgoszcz seen from the water tower at 1 Filarecka Street --Igor123121 22:53, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Bydgoszcz seen from the water tower at 1 Filarecka Street --Igor123121 22:53, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Composition: 2/3 of sky + buildings at the bottom are cut-off. --Augustgeyler 03:43, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Bydgoszcz seen from the water tower at 1 Filarecka Street --Igor123121 22:53, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Rolling chassis of a BMW E9 at Techno-Classica 2024, Essen --MB-one 21:55, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose DoF too low (back wheel is already blurry) --Aciarium 09:54, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2 Gala RHIBs at Interboot-Hafen 2023, Friedrichshafen --MB-one 21:55, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Ford Mustang Mk. I convertible on the Old Bridge of Heidelberg during ADAC Deutschland Klassik 2025 --MB-one 21:55, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: VELOBerlin 2024 at Tempelhofer Feld, Berlin --MB-one 21:55, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of a recycling facility in Bürstadt --MB-one 21:55, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Lacks sharpness --Aciarium 09:54, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Goods from India for sale in Pike Place Market, Seattle --Julian Lupyan 20:37, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: "Maximilien Restaurant" neon sign in Pike Place Market, Seattle --Julian Lupyan 20:37, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Hemingway Rum Co. Distillery, Key West --Julian Lupyan 20:37, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Atrium of the house of Fabius Amandus, Pompeii, Italy --Lrkrol 19:19, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Right transept seen from the Gregorian Chapel of St. Peter's Basilica, showing the statue of St. Bonfilius Monaldi underneath the words "... TU ES CHRISTUS FILIUS DEI ...", Vatican City, Rome, Italy --Lrkrol 19:19, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Pontifical Swiss Guardsman at the bronze door of the Apostolic Palace, Vatican City, Rome, Italy --Lrkrol 19:19, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Pdanese 00:06, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kalanchoe blossfeldiana Poelin. Santiago de Compostela. Galicia (Spain).  Info Flower with 10-12 mm. ----Lmbuga 18:38, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:51, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kalanchoe blossfeldiana Poelin. Santiago de Compostela. Galicia (Spain).  Info Flower with 10-12 mm. ----Lmbuga 18:38, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:11, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rufous hornero (Furnarius rufus) --Charlesjsharp 18:37, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:48, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rufous hornero (Furnarius rufus) --Charlesjsharp 18:37, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:49, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rufous hornero (Furnarius rufus) at nest --Charlesjsharp 18:37, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 19:37, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coscoroba swans (Coscoroba coscoroba) pair with cygnets --Charlesjsharp 18:37, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:49, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coscoroba swans (Coscoroba coscoroba) pair with cygnet --Charlesjsharp 18:37, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:51, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 3 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 18:30, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:52, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 4-6 Grunwaldzka Street in Kłodzko 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 18:30, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:52, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 4-6 Grunwaldzka Street in Kłodzko 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 18:30, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:52, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 4-6 Grunwaldzka Street in Kłodzko 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 18:30, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:52, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 4-6 Grunwaldzka Street in Kłodzko 4 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 18:30, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:52, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wolford bodysuit blouses. Left blue in faux wrap and right orange in high-waisted style.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Tobias ToMar Maier 18:15, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. I dislike the image (the woman's body looks like an object), but the quality is excellent. --Lmbuga 18:32, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
     Support If it were men would we say the same thing (and there are men who pose for fashion)? Here they are consenting, for me there is no problem. --Sebring12Hrs 18:47, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
     Comment Yes, I would have said the same thing about men, but the social reality is not the same. I am surprised that you ignore reality and that you express yourself with the lightness with which you express yourself. --Lmbuga 19:00, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
     Comment Images like these can be very good. I have not inferred any intention on the part of the nominator. I have promoted them as excellent. But, at least in my world, women are still objects and they die, and I have the right to say so when an image promotes – perhaps unintentionally – a sexist attitude. --Lmbuga 19:11, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
     Comment To me — sorry for being so weird — I would be embarrassed to post those photos. --Lmbuga 19:19, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
     Support Resuming: This is a QI --Earth605 19:23, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
     Comment @Earth605: You don't need to promote the image. I had promoted it the first time around. If you vote now, realise that you are voting in favour of the use of women as objects IMO. And you do so because by voting in favour, which is not necessary, you ignore the rest. --Lmbuga 19:43, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wolford bodysuit blouses. Left blue in faux wrap and right orange in high-waisted style.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Tobias ToMar Maier 18:15, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. I dislike the image (the woman's body looks like an object), but the quality is excellent. --Lmbuga 18:31, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
     Comment A photo you will love to show your children to teach them respect for diversity. --Lmbuga 20:45, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
     Comment Reverted to "/Promotion" because of the supporting vote. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:30, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Small farmhouse in Oberweilbach, heritage monument in need of restoration --Kritzolina 17:56, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    The right side is leaning. --Sebring12Hrs 19:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The church St. Johann Baptist in Oberweilbach, Hebertshausen, Bavaria --Kritzolina 17:56, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Subject underexposed, sky partially blown-out --Aciarium 09:54, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Construction site in Freiham seen from Gustl-Bayrhammer-Straße across Aubinger Allee --Kritzolina 17:56, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination 28 Quai Ségur d'Aguesseau, Cahors (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 17:56, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Poor quality IMO, sorry --Lmbuga 18:25, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
     Comment A little too borderline actually, no problem ;) --Sebring12Hrs 18:43, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pavillon de l'eau, quai Louis-Blériot, Paris 16e (by Polymagou) --Sebring12Hrs 17:56, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Pdanese 00:21, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paris 15e - Rue Antoine Bourdelle - Porte au numéro 4 bis (by Romainbehar) --Sebring12Hrs 17:56, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:45, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Papal coat of arms with dragon and allegorical figures at Vatican Museums (by Wilfredor) --Sebring12Hrs 17:56, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    I find the purple shadows very distracting. Her face (and also the right side of the image) lacks clarity. --Lmbuga 18:21, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Painting Detail in St. Peter's Basilica (by Wilfredor) --Sebring12Hrs 17:56, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 18:12, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Leoben-Lerchenfeld Train Station --Aciarium 15:51, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Nice composition. But unfortunately the image lacks sharpness and is tilted cw. --Augustgeyler 18:45, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Bahnstraße, Leoben --Aciarium 15:51, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Main entrance, TTZ Leoben --Aciarium 15:51, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:45, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kienbergweg, Leoben --Aciarium 15:51, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:06, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination RHI Magnesita Technology Center (Leoben, Austria) --Aciarium 15:51, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:45, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beffroi de Douai vu de la Rue de l'Université --JackyM59 15:04, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, and I also love the composition. --Wobbanight 15:09, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ganden Sumtseling Monastery in Shrangri-La, China (by 瑞丽江的河水) --Wobbanight 14:19, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JackyM59 15:05, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Matthew Payne's Ford Mustang Supercar at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final --Pangalau 12:54, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:12, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Austin Cindric's Ford Mustang Supercar at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final --Pangalau 12:54, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Nice composition --Lmbuga 13:43, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Will Brown's Chevrolet Camaro Supercar at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final --Pangalau 12:54, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:12, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Chaz Mostert's Ford Mustang Supercar at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final --Pangalau 12:54, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good but there is some tilt --Poco a poco 14:49, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
     Comment Yes, I have attempted to correct the tilt as much as possible without cropping the subject. --Pangalau 04:58, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Kai Allen's Ford Mustang Supercar at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final --Pangalau 12:54, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Same here, there is some tilt, look at the background --Poco a poco 14:49, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
     Comment I also have attempted to correct the tilt as much as possible without cropping the subject. --Pangalau 04:58, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Collège Théodore Monod d'Aniche --JackyM59 12:04, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Pangalau 12:55, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
    Please, add a proper category (related to colleges). Why do you remove the camera data? --Poco a poco 14:54, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
    Categories created. These two photos were sent by the Commons Android app to complete the WikiData map. Hence the difficulty with the categories. In the description, I can see the camera's Exif metadata. Strange. --JackyM59 15:36, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
    The XMP box in Gimp was unchecked. --JackyM59 17:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Complexe sportif Pierre de Coubertin d'Aniche --JackyM59 12:04, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Please, add a more specific category apart from the town --Poco a poco 14:51, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
    Sorry. Categories added --JackyM59 15:36, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:46, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An unindentified Quercus tree. It could be either Q. robur, Q. petraea or Q. cerris. It is most probably Q. robur --Earth605 11:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Nice composition. But unfortunately  Level of detail too low and over-sharpened. --Augustgeyler 12:18, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Not sharp enough to me. --Sebring12Hrs 12:22, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Port of Copenhagen seen from Bryggebroen bridge --Kallerna 11:47, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very good quality. --Earth605 12:10, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brygge Bridge --Kallerna 11:47, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:19, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wennbergsiloen residential building --Kallerna 11:47, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 12:10, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Port of Copenhagen in Islands Brygge --Kallerna 11:47, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JackyM59 12:06, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nyhavn, Copenhagen --Kallerna 11:47, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JackyM59 12:06, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Purple Jellydisc on the bark of a dead tree near the witch's cottage in the Forstenrieder Park, district Munich, Germany --FlocciNivis 09:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 10:13, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Summit rosebush at the rock formation Los Azulejos in the Teide National Park, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 09:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support the plant may stance better from the background, but overall the quality is good. --Harlock81 17:29, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hairy Beggarticks in the Reserva Natural Especial del Chinyero close to the road TF-373 --FlocciNivis 09:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:08, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Canary Islands Strawberry-tree at the Mirador Pico de las Flores in El Rosario, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 09:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JackyM59 12:06, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
     Comment @FlocciNivis: Very nice detail and quality. I would have liked the tree to be complete. The problem is that there is a bird or a fly in the centre of the upper edge of the photo, and a dust spot underneath it. Right next to it, on the right, there is another almost imperceptible dust spot. --Lmbuga 12:08, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
    I removed the insect and dust spots. Unfortunately it was a bit narrow up there. So it was difficult to get the tree in its completeness into the picture without other stuff like branches disturbing it --FlocciNivis 12:42, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 15:59, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View to the building at the Unterer Schenkgarten 25 in Ingelheim am Rhein --FlocciNivis 09:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Really like the angle. --Earth605 12:10, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Longfin grouper (Epinephelus quoyanus), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 09:36, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 10:12, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blue dragon (Pteraeolidia ianthina), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 09:36, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:25, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Granulated sea star (Choriaster granulatus), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 09:36, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 11:47, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red cheek fairy basslet (Pseudanthias huchtii), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 09:36, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:30, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moorish idol (Zanclus cornutus), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 09:36, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:30, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Topiary, Rue de la Souvenance 3, in Blandain, Tournai, Belgium --Velvet 09:10, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:25, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mansion, Rue de la Souvenance, in Blandain, Tournai, Belgium --Velvet 09:09, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality --FlocciNivis 11:25, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz X167 in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 08:21, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 16:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Toyota Celica liftback (T180) in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 08:21, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Volvo V60 Polestar Engineered in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 08:21, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 14:09, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dijon (Côte-d'Or, France) - Saint Michael church - West portals --Benjism89 08:20, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:50, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dijon (Côte-d'Or, France) - Saint Michael church - Details of the West facade : Baruch and Isaiah --Benjism89 08:20, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:26, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dijon (Côte-d'Or, France) - Saint Michael church - Trumeau with a statue of archangel Michael --Benjism89 08:20, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:26, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dijon (Côte-d'Or, France) - Saint Michael church - Altar with a statue of Madonna and Child --Benjism89 08:20, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 11:49, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dijon (Côte-d'Or, France) - Saint Michael church - Nave --Benjism89 08:20, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 08:24, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ford Mustang VII GT in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 08:13, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 14:59, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-AMG GT C Edition 50 in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 08:13, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 17:16, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Railway station in Haßfurt, orthophoto --Ermell 08:08, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:04, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Haßfurt train station, aerial view --Ermell 08:08, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 08:24, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meadow near the rugged Ebrach near Vorra in the Bamberg district --Ermell 08:08, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:58, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meadow near the rugged Ebrach near Vorra in the Bamberg district --Ermell 08:08, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 11:54, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White stork Ciconia ciconia with prey --Ermell 08:08, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 08:24, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Park in Szczytna 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:04, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Park in Szczytna 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:04, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Please, add a proper description/cat this is no park but a building --Poco a poco 14:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 3 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:04, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:17, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 3 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:04, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:17, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 3 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 3 --Jacek Halicki 08:04, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:16, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blue Whistling-Thrush (Myophonus caeruleus) in Latpanchar, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:32, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blue Whistling-Thrush (Myophonus caeruleus) in Latpanchar, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:32, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blue Whistling-Thrush (Myophonus caeruleus) in Latpanchar, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:32, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black-winged Cuckooshrike (Lalage melaschistos) in Sundarbans National Park, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:32, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:06, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black-winged Cuckooshrike (Lalage melaschistos) in Sundarbans National Park, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:32, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:06, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Flooding in Borongan, Eastern Samar due to heavy rain brought by Tropical Depression Wilma (2025) --TheNuggeteer 07:25, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Artistically designed front door “Rua de Santa Maria 33” (The arT of oPEn doORs), Funchal, Madeira, Portugal --XRay 07:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:27, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Farol da Ponta do Pargo, Ponta do Pargo, Madeira, Portugal --XRay 07:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:18, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Artistically designed front door “Rua de Santa Maria 55” (The arT of oPEn doORs), Funchal, Madeira, Portugal --XRay 07:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:14, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Levada to the trout farm (Viveiros de Trutas), Ribeiro Frio, São Roque do Faial, Madeira, Portugal --XRay 07:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:11, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the Jardim Botânico da Madeira onto the ER101 expressway, Santa Maria Maior, Madeira, Portugal --XRay 07:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:13, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vienna-Favoriten, reflection in the windows of the Hauptbahnhof --Michielverbeek 06:24, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 21:05, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vienna, Haas Haus --Michielverbeek 06:24, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Borderline sharpness and detail. Composition: house is weirdly cut-off short above ground level. --Augustgeyler 12:18, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
    It was very crowdy, so I cut off all people. I take a beter one if I visit Vienna again --Michielverbeek 07:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Vienna, office buildings at the Ober Donaustrasse from the bridge (Marienbrücke) --Michielverbeek 06:24, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Vienna, office buildings at the Ober Donaustrasse from the bridge (Salztorbrücke) --Michielverbeek 06:24, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:09, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trail from Andiast to Breil-Brigels. Bad weather in the Breil-Brigels region, but it has now dried up.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:55, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ruinaulta (Rijnkloof Rheinschlucht) from Valendas to Castrisch. Fast-flowing Vorderrhein in the Rhine Gorge (Rheinschlucht).
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:55, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flowering heather in heathland in Groote Zand nature reserve in Hooghalen Forestry.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:55, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Five-storied Pagoda of Sensoji Temple in Tokyo --Jakubhal 04:47, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Five-storied Pagoda of Sensoji Temple in Tokyo --Jakubhal 04:47, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ksar Aghlad, Algeria --Bgag 03:33, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:45, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ksar Aghlad, Algeria --Bgag 03:33, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ksar Aghlad, Algeria --Bgag 03:33, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:27, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schwarzegg near Maurach in Austria --Plozessor 03:31, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building at Kornmarkt 5 in Quedlinburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. --Tournasol7 02:54, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: GAZ-53 near the level crossing at Amir Temur Street. Kagan, Bukhara Region, Uzbekistan. --Красный 02:20, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Center of Flower. By User:Roy Egloff --Augustgeyler 02:03, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 11:11, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kalanchoe blossfeldiana Poelin. Santiago de Compostela. Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 01:25, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Info Flower with 10-12 mm.--Lmbuga 01:38, 6 December 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

December 5, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Interior of the Transfiguration Cathedral after the Russian missile attach on 23 July 2023, Odesa, Ukraine. By User:Павло Й. Шубарт — NickK 23:56, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 14:59, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: House with Chimaeras, an Art Nouveau landmark in Kyiv, Ukraine. The historic building facade is illuminated at twilight against a dark blue sky. By User:Vadiko~ruwiki — NickK 23:56, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs perspective correction, otherwise good. --Plozessor 03:37, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bell-tower of the Dormition Cathedral at twilight, Kharkiv, Ukraine. By User:Sergiy Bobok — NickK 23:56, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 21:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Dome of Saint George church, Staraya Russa, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:51, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Window of Saint George church (bottom-up view), Staraya Russa, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:51, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Hydrangea in the garden of Saint George church, Staraya Russa, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:51, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Interior details of Chor-Bakr Khanqah, Bukhara region, Uzbelistan. By User:Spartak22 --Екатерина Борисова 23:51, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 21:04, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pier Head at the Liverpool, United Kingdom. --瑞丽江的河水 22:03, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Strong perspective distortion, sorry. It can be corrected. I think that once corrected, the picture should be QI. --Lmbuga 23:48, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
    @Lmbuga: corrected.--瑞丽江的河水 18:33, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Not very sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 19:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manchester Cathedral at Manchester, United Kingdom. --瑞丽江的河水 22:03, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose The image needs significant perspective correction. I don't think it will be possible to salvage the image after that process, I'm afraid. Cheer up. --Lmbuga 23:52, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
    @Lmbuga: Yes you're right it's impossible.--瑞丽江的河水 18:33, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination City skyline of Qujing, Yunnan, China. --瑞丽江的河水 22:03, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Perspective should be corrected --Ermell 23:23, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
    @Ermell: corrected.--瑞丽江的河水 18:33, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Not sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 19:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Red Land located in Xundian, Yunnan, China. --瑞丽江的河水 22:03, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 19:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Tropic of Cancer Sign Park at Mojiang, Yunnan, China. --瑞丽江的河水 22:03, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 19:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: orange tip (Anthocharis cardamines) --Romzig 20:12, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Leptophyes albovittata, male --Romzig 20:12, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The Basilica School of Saint Mary Star of the Sea, Key West --Julian Lupyan 18:52, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Underexposed --Aciarium 17:20, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
    @Aciarium:  Done Exposure corrected --Julian Lupyan 20:44, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
     Comment Reverted to "/Nomination" because there is no vote yet with which you can disagree. Please discuss here. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:45, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Façade of Key West Shipwreck Museum among palm fronds --Julian Lupyan 18:52, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Turquoise house in Key West, Florida --Julian Lupyan 18:52, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Composition: Very heavy on the left side --Aciarium 17:20, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Bakhtiyor Rakhman, uzbek singer and musician --Umarxon III 16:02, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: MG ZS (crossover, second generation) at Automesse Ludwigsburg 2025 --Alexander-93 14:28, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Mazda6e at Automesse Ludwigsburg 2025 --Alexander-93 14:28, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:16, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Residential car park in Almaty --MB-one 12:45, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Presentation at Media Stage of Auto Zürich 2024 --MB-one 12:45, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Cropping: Too much space at the top, feet cut off --Aciarium 17:26, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
     Done cropped in for a more balanced composition. --MB-one 11:44, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: MG EV4 at Techno-Classica 2024, Essen --MB-one 12:45, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Cormorant sitting on old groynes in Heringsdorf, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern --MB-one 12:45, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 21:02, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kia EV3 GT-Line at Automesse Ludwigsburg 2025 --Alexander-93 12:40, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:16, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kia EV4 GT-Line at Automesse Ludwigsburg 2025 --Alexander-93 12:40, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:16, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Rear view of Mazda Vision X-Coupe --TTTNIS 10:10, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    JPEG artifacts and color banding noticable. Is it possible to export this image again in higher quality? --Aciarium 09:54, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mazda Vision X-Compact at the Japan Mobility Show 2025 --TTTNIS 10:10, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose JPEG artifacts --Aciarium 16:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rear view of Mazda Vision X-Compact --TTTNIS 10:10, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose JPEG artifacts --Aciarium 16:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Toyota Corolla Concept at the Japan Mobility Show 2025 --TTTNIS 10:10, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:27, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Graffiti by Martin Blumöhr at the bridge, which the tram of the line 23 of Munich crosses between the stations Schwabing Nord and Domagkstraße --FlocciNivis 09:27, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:17, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Spa Park in Duszniki-Zdrój, statue of Fryderyk Chopin --Jacek Halicki 07:55, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Dijon (Côte-d'Or, France) - Facade of the second floor of Caryatids House --Benjism89 06:42, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 21:01, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Sea slug (Phyllidia coelestis), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 06:34, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    noised --George Chernilevsky 07:15, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
     Done --Poco a poco 20:09, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grüningen in Germany-BB, church: the Dorfkirche --Michielverbeek 06:16, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 21:00, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Broc Feeney at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final Parade. --Pangalau 04:57, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 17:16, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Door in Ksar of Ighzer, Algeria --Bgag 03:50, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Is the colour balance correct? --Ermell 20:32, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

December 4, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Bird's-eye view of the Berdychiv Carmelite Monastery, Zhytomyr Oblast, Ukraine. By User:Ryzhkov Oleksandr --NickK 23:59, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    It looks crooked. The perspective needs to be corrected. Otherwise, it's good. --Lmbuga 01:53, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Hydrangea in the garden of Saint George church, Staraya Russa, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:38, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Upper exterior of Key West Shipwreck Museum --Julian Lupyan 22:30, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination American Cruise Lines' American Patriot, docked at Key West Cruise Port --Julian Lupyan 22:30, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Subject significantly obstructed by trees. --Aciarium 16:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Shengjing Pass Border Paifang at Yunnan, China --瑞丽江的河水 22:20, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Significant defringe artifacts outlining roof --Julian Lupyan 22:35, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Abandoned former Bijiang County in Yunnan, China --瑞丽江的河水 22:20, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 19:24, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gongshan Derung and Nu Autonomous County in Yunnan, China --瑞丽江的河水 22:20, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 19:24, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Place Jean Jaures de Somain --JackyM59 19:56, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Gare de Somain --JackyM59 19:56, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Wiki Debates Logo --Suyash.dwivedi 19:04, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Please embed all text as paths. --Aciarium 17:19, 6 December 2025 (UTC) : Done Suyash.dwivedi 20:11, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
     Comment Reverted to "/Nomination" because there is no vote to disagree with. Please read the voting guidelines. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:36, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eastern towhee, Pleasant Valley Wildlife Sanctuary, Lenox, MA USA --Pdanese 16:37, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 13:34, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A breeding brown-capped rosy finch at the crest of the Sandia Mountains --Polinova 15:13, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:34, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black-capped warbling finch (Microspingus melanoleucus) male --Charlesjsharp 14:46, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose  Level of detail too low --Aciarium 13:34, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tesla Model Y (2025) at MYLE Festival 2025 --Alexander-93 12:43, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 16:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trepel Champ 70U cargo high loader at ILA Berlin Air Show 2024 --MB-one 11:30, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose DoF not sufficient (the vehicle's rear end is not sharp) --Aciarium 13:34, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Spa Park in Duszniki-Zdrój, statue of Fryderyk Chopin 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 11:29, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: View from a bridge in the München Nord Rangierbahnhof --FlocciNivis 11:17, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Overexposed in my opinion, otherwise good photo! --Aciarium 13:34, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
     Done I changed the exposure now --FlocciNivis 14:38, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Pierre marquant les étapes du labyrinthe du jardin d'essai à Ouidah --Fawaz.tairou 09:41, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    It needs a more specific category --Poco a poco 19:39, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dodge Charger Daytona (2024) at MYLE Festival 2025 --Alexander-93 09:19, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 17:16, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BYD Atto 2 at MYLE Festival 2025 --Alexander-93 09:19, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 17:16, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: migrant hawker (Aeshna mixta) --Romzig 08:45, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Regenstein castle ruins near Blankenburg in the Harz Mountains --Romzig 08:45, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose  Underexposed --Aciarium 21:04, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Philipp Melanchthon statue in Quedlinburg --Romzig 08:45, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Lighting not optimal; overexposed background, underexposed subject --Aciarium 14:09, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hamerkops (Scopus umbretta), Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda --Poco a poco 07:42, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose DoF, also very bland IMO --Aciarium 13:41, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Collector sea urchin (Tripneustes gratilla), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 07:42, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose DoF --Aciarium 13:41, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spa Park in Duszniki-Zdrój 4 --Jacek Halicki 07:13, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Bad lighting; most of the scene is in (relatively hard) shadow. --Aciarium 13:41, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Burg bei Magdeburg in Germany-ST, street view Berlinier Weg with a view to the church (Unser Lieben Frauen Kirche) --Michielverbeek 06:20, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Underexposed. --Sebring12Hrs 12:29, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Burg bei Magdeburg in Germany-ST, water tower: Wasserturm auf dem Weinberg --Michielverbeek 06:20, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Underexposed. --Sebring12Hrs 12:29, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Burg bei Magdeburg in Germany-ST, tower: the Berliner Torturm --Michielverbeek 06:20, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Underexposed. --Sebring12Hrs 12:29, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Frightened kitten (saw a dog) in a yard of Saint Nicholas church. Kagan, Bukhara Region, Uzbekistan. --Красный 04:46, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too much space around the subject. Level of detail too low for a crop. --Aciarium 13:11, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lada 2107 in the yard of the Saint Nocholas church. Kagan, Bukhara Region, Uzbekistan. --Красный 04:46, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Underexposed, and could benefit from a bit of cropping, especially from the right side. Otherwise good quality! --Aciarium 13:11, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Close wing resting of Lamproptera curius (Fabricius, 1787) - White Dragontail. By User:SVKMBFLY --Atudu 02:21, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Could be a bit cropped from the left --Aciarium 17:16, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
     Comment Reverted to "/Nomination" because there is no vote to disagree with. Please read the voting guidelines. --
• 
  • Nomination: 456 ft (139 m) tall skyscraper in Nashville, TN. --Wobbanight 02:04, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review Needs a perspective correction, bottom crop not well done and too much space in top --Michielverbeek 07:49, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Weender Landstraße 2 in Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 01:04, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Right side of image is blurry. --Екатерина Борисова 01:16, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

December 3, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Mascaron under the roof of Palace of Culture, Lomonosov, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:38, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Street in Matera (by Berthold Werner) --Sebring12Hrs 19:46, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Hotel Palm Camayenne in Conakry. By Mohamed Finando --Aboubacarkhoraa 19:00, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Bad top crop, also horizontal alignment is needed. --Екатерина Борисова 03:29, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Hotel Palm Camayenne in Conakry. By Mohamed Finando --Aboubacarkhoraa 19:00, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    perspective distortion, also a bit noisy --Jakubhal 19:19, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palm Camayenne Hotel in Conakry. By Mohamed Finando --Aboubacarkhoraa 19:00, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Composition: too heavy on the top --Aciarium 17:16, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palace in Rogalin. By User:Martalesnik --Gower 17:45, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Strange translucent sign on the left with an H --JackyM59 18:06, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose There are blue CAs. --Sebring12Hrs 22:09, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cementownia Grodziec in Będzin. By User:Śląski Włóczykij --Gower 17:45, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 11:11, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination L'Aber Ildut - Avril 2023 (02) --JackyM59 16:54, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too much going on in the foreground --Aciarium 21:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gorée en 2024 - coquillages --Fawaz.tairou 14:17, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Please categorise this image! --Augustgeyler 14:27, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Borderline crop, not a good DoF. --Sebring12Hrs 23:21, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coucher de soleil sur Dakar - Gorée en 2024 --Fawaz.tairou 14:17, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gorée en 2024 - Maison des esclaves --Fawaz.tairou 14:17, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose  Level of detail too low --Aciarium 21:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Gottfried-Keller-Straße, Berlin-Westend --MB-one 12:10, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Heuliez GX 337 E at Busworld Europe 2023 --MB-one 12:10, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 21:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Flags at World Championchip (2024) in Brunnen, Switzerland. By User:Roy Egloff --Augustgeyler 11:24, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rear view of 2024-25 Nissan Gen3 Evo --TTTNIS 09:25, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Frederic Chopin Theatre in Duszniki-Zdrój 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 09:18, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Spa Park in Duszniki-Zdrój 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 09:18, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Question Is it OK, to show these peoples faces? --Augustgeyler 11:29, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
     Question Did these people agree being photographed? --Augustgeyler 01:07, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
     Comment In Spain, this photograph complies with the law. Lmbuga --Lmbuga 10:43, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
    But this is Poland. And there people need to be asked. --Augustgeyler 18:38, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spa Park in Duszniki-Zdrój 5 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 09:18, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Significant distortion and lack of sharpness in the lower third --Aciarium 16:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Austral blackbird (Curaeus curaeus) --Charlesjsharp 09:02, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Overexposed and could use a little cropping, but otherwise good! --Aciarium 13:34, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination tree damsel bug (Himacerus apterus) --Romzig 08:14, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Song thrush in the Kröllwitz district of Halle (Saale) --Romzig 08:14, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Very sorry. Nice composition, but not enough detail on the bird. --Pdanese 00:27, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Richard Robert Rive Monument in Halle (Saale) --Romzig 08:14, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Wörlitz Castle --Romzig 08:14, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Russian Navy warship Moskva (121) and Ukrainian Navy corvette Prydniprovia (U155) in 2012 -- George Chernilevsky 07:50, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 17:26, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An outlet at the Bunker Fridolin --FlocciNivis 07:34, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dijon (Côte-d'Or, France) - Church of Our Lady - Gargoyles on the main facade --Benjism89 07:26, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Sharpness at the front parts could be better. But good quality. --Augustgeyler 02:05, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Larrousse Lola LC88-Cosworth at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final --Pangalau 03:44, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed

December 2, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Wing of Grand Menshikov Palace, Oranienbaum Park, Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:Игорь Гордеев --Екатерина Борисова 23:44, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Liatris spicata in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:44, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The Hostellerie Le Maréchal seen from bridge of rue Turenne in Petite Venise in Colmar --FlocciNivis 20:39, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    I really like the photo, great composition, colour and vinter light. But the lower left part is not really sharp. --ArildV 22:00, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
    And it's a bit noisy. --Sebring12Hrs 23:31, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The Sumpfstrecke of the Ensemble Rischbach-Anlage --FlocciNivis 20:39, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Male common blackbird (Turdus merula) feeding fledging common blackbird, Jardim da Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:25, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Iveco Crossway Elec at Busworld Europe 2025 in Brussels --MB-one 15:30, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Can you check the perspective correction, please? It feels slightly off. --Mike Peel 21:30, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
     Done thanks for the review --MB-one 16:59, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. Much better, thanks! --Mike Peel 08:26, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Coat of arms of the Executive Air Transport Wing of the German Air force on a Eurocopter Cougar VIP helicopter --MB-one 15:30, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Too much space around the actual subject; if resolution allows it, cropping (and brightening) might be an option. --Aciarium 13:09, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Inflatable stand-up paddle boards --MB-one 15:30, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Just a standard image. A lot surrounding the object is distracting, the trash, stuff in the background... --Earth605 06:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Canada goose, closeup, Broad Brook Millpond, East Windsor, CT USA --Pdanese 11:26, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    insufficient sharpness inho --Gower 16:44, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
    No worries. Thank you for all the reviews! --Pdanese 18:26, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
     Support Sharpness is fine IMO --MB-one 15:39, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Chiesa di Santa Lucia in Colle Santa Lucia, Veneto, Italy --Ximonic 10:41, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review Beautiful composition, but imo too nuch deformed to be a QI photo --Michielverbeek 11:54, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kai Allen at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final. --Pangalau 08:29, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Insufficient level of detail or slight blur IMO --Aciarium 21:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brendon Hartley at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final. --Pangalau 08:29, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 13:34, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brendon Hartley at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final. --Pangalau 08:29, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 13:34, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Confectionery store at Lalon Akhara. --ROCKY 07:43, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose  Level of detail too low --Aciarium 21:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Museu Paulista, São Paulo --Mike Peel 07:34, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 21:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Martinsrieth in Germany-ST, church: the Sankt Martinkirche --Michielverbeek 06:29, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Underexposed and the top is not sharp. --Екатерина Борисова 01:33, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rainbow Skink, female; Thüringer Zoopark, Erfurt --Llez 06:27, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose A bit too blurry IMO. --Aciarium 13:34, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sudan plated lizard; Thüringer Zoopark, Erfurt --Llez 06:27, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose DoF not sufficient IMO. The lizard's eye is out of focus. --Aciarium 13:34, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sign about the restoration work in progress in Uzbek, Russian and English in the Railway workers park. Kagan, Bukhara Region, Uzbekistan. --Красный 03:35, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose  Underexposed --Aciarium 09:54, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Swensen Tower in New Haven, CT (by Kenneth C. Zirkel) --Wobbanight 01:01, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Very good image, but what about the top crop ? --Sebring12Hrs 01:19, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

December 1, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Vysokaya Tower of Pskov Kremlin, Russia. By User:Tsyganov Sergey --Екатерина Борисова 23:39, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Grainy sky. Else very good --MB-one 20:41, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Petunia in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:39, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:16, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cupra Tavascan VZ at AMA Marbach 2025 --Alexander-93 18:12, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 16:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Bydgoszcz seen from the water tower at 1 Filarecka Street --Igor123121 17:49, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Lots of sky and the categories need improvement. Othwerwise good --MB-one 20:41, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ford E-Transit Custom in Leonberg --Alexander-93 17:22, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 13:34, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volkswagen T7 e-Transporter in Leonberg --Alexander-93 17:22, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:41, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mallard duckling, Wethersfield Cove, Wethersfield, CT USA --Pdanese 17:14, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    nice, but very noisy at full view --Gower 15:41, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 548 ft (167 m) tall building in Philadelphia, PA. First non-religious building to reach 492 ft (150 m) in height. --Wobbanight 16:21, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    I really like this, but I feel like it needs a slight clockwise rotation (or some very minor PC) --Pdanese 17:06, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rear view of 1965 Honda S600 --TTTNIS 11:37, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 16:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monuments aux Morts de Brunémont --JackyM59 10:04, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Church, monument and flag are leaning outwards. --Augustgeyler 11:42, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
    Perspective correction made --JackyM59 15:24, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
    There is now an error on the upper left edge. Additionally everything looks tilted ccw. Please redo PC combined with proper rotation. --Augustgeyler 16:21, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
    Correction made based on the walls of the house and the church. In my other photos, the flag also leans to the left. Thank you for your patience. --JackyM59 18:42, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
    It did improve. But the church tower is still leaning to the right. Is it leaning in the real world? Otherwise the image is still tilted cw. --Augustgeyler 19:46, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
     Support Borderline, but OK. --Augustgeyler 18:38, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mairie de Brunémont --JackyM59 10:04, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:28, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Église Notre-Dame-de-l'Assomption de Brunémont --JackyM59 10:04, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    tight crop and branch to clone out --Gower 15:41, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
    First attempt to remove a branch. Was it successful? --JackyM59 08:36, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BMX demonstration at VELOBerlin 2024 --MB-one 09:14, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, but I'd suggest to crop the bottom a bit. --Екатерина Борисова 04:09, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination London Eye seen from Jubilee Gardens, South Bank --Mike Peel 08:54, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose A little too hazy, subject partially obstructed --Aciarium 21:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: African grey hornbill (Lophoceros nasutus), Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda --Poco a poco 07:01, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Comment Not sharp enough. --Harlock81 14:38, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
     New version --Poco a poco 19:39, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
     Comment Better, but imho the quality is still a bit lower than that of those already in the Category:Quality images of Tockus nasutus. --Harlock81 23:10, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View of the canoes at the edge of the landing stage on Kassa Island, one of the Loos Islands. By Mohamed Finando -- Aboubacarkhoraa 04:00, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    The white frame must go. Otherwise acceptable. --Plozessor 04:49, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trunk of a Carob tree (Ceratonia siliqua - Alvesgaspar 00:02, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:41, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

November 30, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Side view of St. Catherine cathedral (with Resurrection cathedral under construction in the background), Luga, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:51, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:41, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Durham Light Infantry Memorial Statue --Mike Peel 20:30, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:41, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Collective Garden of SK Plant No. 2 - Road to Zapadnaya Zvezda village --Юрий Д.К. 19:26, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    A bit too bright and top-right branches have purple fringes. --Екатерина Борисова 01:44, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
    I will try to fix --Юрий Д.К. 18:43, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
    @Екатерина Борисова: Hi, CA has been reduced and the image has been darkened. --Юрий Д.К. 20:33, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
    Fringes are still here. --Екатерина Борисова 04:19, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Chorzów, Villa di Biasi, side view --Gower 17:27, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    CA's on right windows, and shadows are too harsh. --Екатерина Борисова 03:14, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jack Le Brocq at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final Parade --Pangalau 14:14, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aciarium 16:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bryce Fullwood at the 2025 Adelaide Grand Final Parade --Pangalau 14:14, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:41, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Exterior of the cloister of Val-de-Grâce (by Moonik) --Sebring12Hrs 12:43, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Horizontal PC needed --Gower 16:44, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift (front) of the Austrian Financial Police in Leoben, Austria --Aciarium 11:40, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:41, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Palace of the Emir of Bukhara. Kagan, Bukhara Region, Uzbekistan. --Красный 07:50, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    The tones in the top right don't look natural to me. A grey sky? --Poco a poco 08:58, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
    There are also dust spots that should be removed. --Petro Stelte 09:16, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
    Removed the spots. --Красный 18:45, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palace of the Emir of Bukhara. Kagan, Bukhara Region, Uzbekistan. --Красный 07:50, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    The sky looks  Overprocessed or as if there was a sand storm. Fixable? --Augustgeyler 11:41, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose  no response --Augustgeyler 18:38, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Nymphaeum of Tipasa, Algeria --Bgag 03:34, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    very bright one --Gower 17:26, 1 December 2025 (UTC)  Done Better now? --Bgag 18:50, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

November 29, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Sculpture in New Haven, CT. --Wobbanight 20:43, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    There is no freedom of panorama for sculpture in the United States, so none of these Liberman images can be hosted on Commons. --Acroterion 03:35, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination --Wobbanight 15:26, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Passenger cabin of a Eurocopter EC 135 P2+ executive helicopter at AERO Friedrichshafen 2025 --MB-one 11:20, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Very bright outside, a little underexposed inside. Could this be mitigated through highlights/shadows manipulation? --Aciarium 21:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

November 28, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Kirov avenue with former residential (now commerce) building in Luga, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:43, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 02:33, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
     Done Tried to fix. --Екатерина Борисова 02:39, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Thanks, but the right is very unsharp. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 18:56, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Riese & Müller Carrie at VELOBerlin 2025 --MB-one 20:27, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Maybe "landscape" crop could be better? --Gower 15:41, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
    Thanks for the review. But the main subject (the cargo compartment) has a vertical alignement. So, I don't see how a landscape crop would work. --MB-one 13:00, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Terrain de pétanque d'Auberchicourt--JackyM59 19:42, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    I suggest cloning out that lonely branch from the right --Gower 13:43, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
    16:9 cropping to remove the branch at the top right --JackyM59 18:32, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Bytom, St Hyacinth church interior --Gower 10:19, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Noisy (probably because of strong increase of exposure in low-light areas). Horizontal perpscetive correction would be good for this composition --Benjism89 11:37, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
    @Benjism89: horizontal PC done, thanks for the review :) --Gower 17:35, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
    Still very noisy at the top, visible even at 1 441 × 2 048 pixels --Benjism89 19:24, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

November 27, 2025

• 
  • Nomination China Street in Singapore --MB-one 08:17, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Too much of asphalt in the foreground, and the sky is almost blown out. --Екатерина Борисова 03:38, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
    It was an overcast day and yet there's still detail in the clouds visible. And the asphalt in the foreground is part of the composition. --MB-one 15:35, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
    OK, it's your choice, but I'm not convinced. Maybe someone else will have other opinion. --Екатерина Борисова 01:49, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
    In my opinion, the composition is good and the sky is not unrealistic. However, a slight clockwise rotation is needed, as well as PC. --Julian Lupyan 19:03, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for the review --MB-one 11:54, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Julian Lupyan 16:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of the organ loft, St. Severus' Church, Erfurt --Llez 06:23, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Comment Intense noise reduction led to loss of texture. Fixable? --Augustgeyler 10:25, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
     Done New version from RAW --Llez 18:32, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
    There is now some red chromatic aberration and low sharpness. --Augustgeyler 14:58, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
     Support OK, it is a borderline decision. But I think the CAs are minor enough to promote it as QI. --Augustgeyler 02:05, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

November 25, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Eglise de Marcq-en-Ostrevent - Clocher --JackyM59 12:21, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Shadows are too dark, and it seems that WB is not good here. --Екатерина Борисова 03:48, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
    Corrections made --JackyM59 10:18, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
    It's not the same image. This one is good enough, but my comment was about other photo. I dont't know how to react in such a case. --Екатерина Борисова 03:10, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
    Sorry. I thought we could use another view from the same session. I'll restore it. --JackyM59 10:21, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
    Now it's the very first version, OK. White balance here is normal, but shadows at the bottom are still too dark, and riht crop is too tight (crop of the second version was better IMO). --Екатерина Борисова 03:38, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

November 18, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Garden vase in Lower park of Peterhof, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:36, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    maybe it could be cropped so that the vase was exactly in the middle? --Gower 07:47, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
    It's very easy to crop people on the left side to make the image more symmetrical, but then we'll have shadows of people without people. Do you think it's worth to do? --Екатерина Борисова 00:11, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
    I don't know, we still have shadows here without the objects that cast them from the left --Gower 17:54, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

• To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
• You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
• The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.

Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.

Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted

• In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
• Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add  Oppose and  Support if necessary.
• Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
• Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".

File:Львівська_Ратуша.jpg

• Nomination Bird's-eye view of the Lviv Town Hall building and the surrounding old town, Lviv, Ukraine. By User:Ryzhkov Oleksandr — NickK 23:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
  PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 23:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 23:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
   Comment I disagree. --Wobbanight 03:38, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Isaac_C._Lewis_Cottage_q.jpg

• Nomination The Isaac C. Lewis Cottage in Branford, CT. --Wobbanight 22:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Oppose PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 23:24, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  Can you provide the PC? --Wobbanight 23:29, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Per Sebring12Hrs --Lmbuga 00:35, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
   Comment Response to ‘Can you provide the PC?’ No, I already did it in a photo and it took me an hour. Take responsibility. --Lmbuga 01:07, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Haphazard low-angle shot: distracting twigs and wall. Also substandard technical quality (noise!) --Grand-Duc 04:47, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Isaac_C._Lewis_Cottage_a.jpg

• Nomination The Isaac C. Lewis Cottage in Branford, CT. --Wobbanight 22:30, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Oppose Tight crop and PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 23:24, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  Can you provide the PC? --Wobbanight 23:29, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Per Sebring12Hrs --Lmbuga 00:35, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
   Comment Response to ‘Can you provide the PC?’ No, I already did it in a photo and it took me an hour. Take responsibility. --Lmbuga 01:13, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose The framing is too tight. Too much noise, lack of sharpness. --Grand-Duc 04:47, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Isaac_C._Lewis_Cottage_o_2.jpg

• Nomination The Isaac C. Lewis Cottage in Branford, CT. --Wobbanight 22:28, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion Good photo, but it needs a perspective improvement --Michielverbeek 22:34, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
   Question I need more context so I can try to improve it. --Wobbanight 22:36, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose No need more context. A building should have vertical walls. --Sebring12Hrs 23:24, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
   ? --Wobbanight 23:26, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
   Comment I've straightened the image a little. --Wobbanight 23:41, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Per Sebring12Hrs --Lmbuga 00:40, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Decent composition but insufficient technical quality: lack of sharpness/crisp and too much noise. --Grand-Duc 04:47, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Isaac_C._Lewis_Cottage_h.jpg

• Nomination The Isaac C. Lewis Cottage in Branford, CT. --Wobbanight 22:26, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Oppose Tight crop and PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 23:24, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Per Sebring12Hrs --Lmbuga 00:37, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Isaac_C._Lewis_Cottage_l.jpg

• Nomination The Isaac C. Lewis Cottage in Branford, CT. --Wobbanight 22:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Oppose I'm sorry, but it needs perspective correction. The photo is very narrow (or tight) and cropped at the bottom. The lighting is poor for the time of day it appears to have been taken. The composition, with the tree peeking out on the right, does not impress me. --Lmbuga 22:46, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  @Lmbuga: Can you provide the PC? --Wobbanight 22:48, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  I'd love to help you, but I think it's impossible to straighten the photo without cropping the top. I don't think it's possible with Lightroom (I'm sure of it). I haven't used Gimp very often, so I don't know, but I don't think it can be done with Gimp either. Besides, the rest of what I said still applies. But I'll try, and if I can't do it, I'll show you the image with another name. --Lmbuga 22:59, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Per Lmbuga. Every photo it is the same comment " PC is needed".... Very annoying... --Sebring12Hrs 23:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
   Comment I did what you asked me to do. The result is File:Isaac C. Lewis Cottage l - Retouched.jpg. I like it much better than the photo you uploaded, but just by looking at the lack of detail on the ceiling, you can tell it's not QI. It took me over an hour to do it. Learn Gimp and use Lightroom (this one you have to pay for). --Lmbuga 00:02, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Водопад_на_Емиричка_Река.jpg

• Nomination Cascade waterfalls on Emirica River. --Kiril Simeonovski 14:50, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:09, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Sorry, but IMO it's a bit too blurry to be QI. --Екатерина Борисова 03:51, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose I agree --Julian Lupyan 06:15, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Polish_Aviation_Museum,_39_Jana_Pawła_II_Avenue,_Cyżyny,_Kraków,_Poland_(2).jpg

• Nomination Polish Aviation Museum, 39 Jana Pawła II Avenue, Cyżyny, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 14:28, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Oppose Composition issue: 70% sky and subjects are fare away. --Augustgeyler 18:45, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  I disagree. Please discuss. --Igor123121 20:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose And PC is needed. Buildings are leaning. --Sebring12Hrs 23:27, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Polish_Aviation_Museum,_39_Jana_Pawła_II_Avenue,_Cyżyny,_Kraków,_Poland_(3).jpg

• Nomination Polish Aviation Museum, 39 Jana Pawła II Avenue, Cyżyny, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 14:28, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Oppose Composition issue: 60% sky and subjects are fare away. --Augustgeyler 18:45, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  I disagree. Please discuss. --Igor123121 20:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose And PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 23:27, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Moscow_-_2025_-_Prechistenskaya_Embankment.jpg

• Nomination Moscow - Coleus - Prechistenskaya Embankment --Юрий Д.К. 11:19, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Oppose Not sharp enough --A S M Jobaer 14:45, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  I disagree --Юрий Д.К. 14:53, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Waterfront_Viewpoint_Sign_at_Pike_Place_Market,_Seattle,_Washington,_2025.jpg

• Nomination Waterfront viewpoint sign at Pike Place Market, Seattle --Julian Lupyan 20:37, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Oppose  Underexposed, composition --Aciarium 14:10, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  I disagree. I believe the exposure is true to life, and if it were to be raised, the subject (the neon sign) would not be portrayed well. An elaborated critique for composition would be appreciated. Please discuss. --Julian Lupyan 22:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Blown_Glass_for_sale_in_Pike_Place_Market,_Seattle,_Washington,_2025.jpg

• Nomination Blown glass for sale in Pike Place Market, Seattle --Julian Lupyan 20:37, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Oppose  Underexposed, could be a bit sharper --Aciarium 14:10, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  I disagree. Since the interior of the market is quite dim, I do not believe I should raise exposure to a level where the windows are blown out. Subject is already masked and brightened, and I feel anything further would be unrealistic. The image is already sharpened, though I can sharpen more if this is preferred. Please discuss. --Julian Lupyan 22:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

File:通海文庙-文明坊_2025-08-12_02.jpg

• Nomination The Wenming Archway, Tonghai Confucian Temple, Yunnan, China. --Kcx36 11:10, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
  needs perspective correction, otherwise good imo --FlocciNivis 11:24, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  @FlocciNivis: Taken from a lower angle (see this photo). I think perspective correction would make it look unnatural. --Kcx36 12:31, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  @Kcx36: I agree with you, PC would make it feel unnatural. --Wobbanight 15:06, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  I don't agree. I tried PC on this image and it didn't look unnatural afterwards --FlocciNivis 15:26, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose (I think the previous discussion is over and that we can now express our opinions respectfully.) Per User:FlocciNivis. --Lmbuga 16:03, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
  @FlocciNivis and Lmbuga: perspective correction done.--Kcx36 10:36, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
  Good quality for me now --FlocciNivis 14:34, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Каган,_церковь_Святого_Николая,_кошка_во_дворе.jpg

• Nomination Cat in a yard of Saint Nicholas church. Kagan, Bukhara Region, Uzbekistan. --Красный 04:46, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Support Good quality. Poor old creature. --Екатерина Борисова 03:24, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Not sharp enough IMO, and too much space around the subject --Aciarium 13:09, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose I agree. I believe there is too much noise as well. --Julian Lupyan 06:19, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Paloma_en_el_Palacio_de_Cristal.jpg

• Nomination Pigeon on the steps of the Palacio de Cristal del Retiro, Madrid, Spain.By User:Nerve net --Earth605 11:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 12:06, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose blown background --Charlesjsharp 18:39, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Augustgeyler 18:30, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Taube_mit_Muffin.jpg

• Nomination Pigeon with muffin By User:Elya --Earth605 11:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Красный 14:11, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 18:52, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Sebring12Hrs --Julian Lupyan 21:18, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Sebring12Hrs. --Wobbanight 12:20, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 18:30, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

File:CH.ZH.Affoltern-am-Albis_2024-03-30_Biker.jpg

• Nomination Picture taken in Affoltern am Albis, Switzerland. By User:Roy Egloff --Augustgeyler 02:03, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Sorry, but not sharp. I think 1/40s and ISO 50 (with a full-frame sensor) wasn't adequate to capture a moving subject. --Plozessor 03:36, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment I disagree. Please discuss. I think the shutter speed was intentional to get the rushing by background effect. --Augustgeyler 12:18, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I love the idea and what it's going for, but the subject of the image isn't that sharp in certain areas. Sorry. --Wobbanight 12:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 18:26, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Statue_of_a_zouave_(Algiers).jpg

• Nomination Statue of a zouave in St. Eugene Cemetery, Algiers --Bgag 03:50, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:55, 5 December 2025 (UTC
•  Oppose The statue and its pediment are blown out and lack details. Although it can be fixed. --Екатерина Борисова 03:54, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose  Overexposed . --Augustgeyler 18:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 18:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

File:TR.AY.Aydin_2011-10-03_19_speed.jpg

• Nomination picture taken in Aydin, Turkey. By User:Roy Egloff --Augustgeyler 01:19, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Too much motion blur --Aciarium 17:16, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Support How much is recommended? --Ermell 21:58, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment @Ermell: Motion blur in the background is (usually) no issue at all, especially when the subject is sharp enough. However, most of the bike and most of the rider are blurry, and this seems accidental, rather than being an intentionally used stylistic device. Also,  Overexposed . --Aciarium 09:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Augustgeyler 18:27, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

File:St._Eugene_Cemetery_(Algiers)_09.jpg

• Nomination Military square of St. Eugene Cemetery, Algiers --Bgag 03:13, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:05, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but the image has  Level of detail too low and some highlights are blown out. --Augustgeyler 02:05, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Augustgeyler 18:29, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Mairie_de_Monchecourt.jpg

• Nomination Mairie de Monchecourt --JackyM59 19:42, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Gower 13:43, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but unfortunately the image is lacking detail and texture. --Augustgeyler 02:05, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Augustgeyler 18:28, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

File:青山公园_-_和谐塔_-_航拍_-_2024-06-01.jpg

• Nomination The Peaceful Tower in Lushui, Yunnan, China --瑞丽江的河水 22:20, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Quality is decent, but the composition, lighting, and the nice mix of colors make this image QI, in my opinion. --Wobbanight 01:57, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose The shadow around the tip of the tower could be remedied. --Lmbuga 10:59, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Edge haloing with subject and background sky in upper portion of tower. --E bailey 17:01, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 12:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Rainer_Maria_Salzgeber,_Auto_2025,_Zurich_(20251029-P1073739).jpg

• Nomination Rainer Maria Salzgeber at Auto Zürich 2025 --MB-one 12:10, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Sorry, but unfortunately there is too much motion blur involved. --Augustgeyler 01:07, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment Are we looking at the same photograph? Individual facial hairs are clearly distiguishable, as well as the weave of the clothing's fabric. --MB-one 13:00, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment Yes they are vissible, but motion blured. --Augustgeyler 02:12, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 12:06, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Yellow-crowned_Night_Heron_(Nyctanassa_violacea)_at_dawn,_Montezuma,_Costa_Rica.jpg

• Nomination Yellow-crowned Night Heron at dawn (Nyctanassa violacea) --Hobbyfotowiki 08:09, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Underexposed --Poco a poco 21:44, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support The exposure contributes to the mood in my opinion. The image was also taken in the early hours, which justifies it in my eyes. Good quality. --Julian Lupyan 19:06, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment I'd understand this kind of discussion in FPC, but not here. A proper exposure is QI requisite. And please, have a look at this: COM:QICGVP, especially #6 --Poco a poco 20:57, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my support Thank you very much for the correction. Vote changed from support to struck through comment. --Julian Lupyan 03:14, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Support This is just a photo of a bird at sunrise. --Sebring12Hrs 12:26, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Support For me, it's QI: I would gladly put this A4-sized photo on my living room wall (I don't have a strong desire to expose it. If I did, it would be FP IMO). --Lmbuga 14:06, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Support "Proper exposure" is a QI prerequisite, yes - and IMO this picture is 'properly exposed' for the situation and purpose. --Plozessor (talk) 19:41, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Юрий Д.К. 12:33, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Support per others. Nice photo! --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
•  I reassert my support Seeing as proper exposure seems to be a subjective criterion as I originally believed, I would like to reassert my support with all due respect to Poco a poco. --Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:36, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:36, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Pysocice_street,_view_to_W,_Kościelniki,_Kraków,_Poland.jpg

• Nomination Pysocice street, view to W, Kościelniki, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 21:44, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment Image is  Overexposed . Fixable? --Augustgeyler 01:25, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose  Not done --Augustgeyler 18:46, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Overexposed ??? Euhh not to me. --Sebring12Hrs 02:40, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Indeed slightly overexposed. --Plozessor 19:37, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Though I do like the comp, The image is a bit overexposed. --Wobbanight 12:33, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

File:DAP_(Diammonium_Phosphate)_Granules_(3).jpg

• Nomination DAP (Diammonium Phosphate) Granules --Suyash.dwivedi 19:04, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality.--瑞丽江的河水 22:29, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose The photo needs to be categorised. The category you have does not work and is not sufficient. --Lmbuga 22:36, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

• @Augustgeyler: I have added category thank you for pointing it out- Suyash.dwivedi 12:53, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

(I assure you that I would love to be User:Augustgeyler, but, for the moment, no God has granted me that privilege. Unfortunately for me, I am still User:Lmbuga, ). Thank you for the additional information however, despite the F8, the depth of field seems insufficient for QI being a studio photograph: DoF and detail. The background is uneven and the white balance appears poor. --Lmbuga 00:30, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose IMO, to achieve QI for a completely still and staged product shot, the entire subject should be in sharp focus. May require higher f-stop. Agree with Lmbuga. --E bailey 17:08, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Support ok in my eyes.--Ermell 20:40, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Ermell 20:40, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

File:NPK_19-19-19_Fertilizer_(1).jpg

• Nomination NPK 19-19-19 Fertilizer --Suyash.dwivedi 19:04, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support--瑞丽江的河水 22:32, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose The category assigned to the photo does not work and is insufficient. Furthermore, the description is inadequate: What type of fertiliser is it? --Lmbuga 22:42, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

• @Lmbuga: I have added category thank you for pointing it out-Suyash.dwivedi 12:54, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

• Thank you for the additional information however, despite the F8, the depth of field seems insufficient IMO for QI being a studio photograph. The background is distracting and inappropriate. The plate is not in focus; the top third of the image is out of focus.--Lmbuga 00:36, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Agree with Lmbuga. Not a high quality "product shot". --E bailey 17:04, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 09:16, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Wallhausen-Rietnordhausen,_de_Sankt_Jacobikirche_Dm094-84507_IMG_755_2025-05-17_11.33.jpg

• Nomination Rietnordhausen in Germany-ST, church: the Sankt Jacobikirche --Michielverbeek 06:29, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose The image is lacking sharpness. --Augustgeyler 18:46, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment Imo opinion the main object is sharp enough for QI. And indeed the left background is not sharp --Michielverbeek 18:41, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 11:53, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak support I like the comp, but the image is too blurry on the sides, though Sebring12Hrs is right about the subject being sharp. --Wobbanight 12:30, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:21, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

File:2024_Polanica-Zdrój,_ul._Warszawska_27_(4).jpg

• Nomination 27 Warszawska Street in Polanica-Zdrój 4 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 15:04, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Question Is that person in his private house aware of being published online? --Augustgeyler 21:59, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

• @Augustgeyler: Yes, after taking the photo I asked about it, I always do that in such situations.--Jacek Halicki 07:41, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

• Very good! So did you add the correct template? There is just the warning about personal rights. Is there a template which tells that you do have permission by this person? --Augustgeyler 13:47, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:39, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose … for now. Jacek stated that consent exists, but no indication of consent is provided on the file page (VRTS or explicit disclaimer). The template “Please respect personality rights” does not confirm permission. Since the person is clearly identifiable and photographed on private property, documentation of consent (according to „prawo do wizerunku“) is needed before the image can be promoted. --Augustgeyler 01:07, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment Oh, i just thought the second template was optional only, so i promoted this photo. Sorry, i didn't mean to be rude or ignored your opinion. -- George Chernilevsky 12:23, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Question I have a question. I would have promoted that image, if I had found it, with or without a template. The question is: Is it legal for me to edit the image and add the template? I would do it right now. I would put the template there, and if the author deletes it, that's their problem. Another question: What if there is no problem? If there is a problem, we will have to react with or without a template, I say. Does the template really serve any purpose other than to ease consciences? In my opinion, most of those templates (like {{consent}}) are just for show.--Lmbuga 14:33, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 14:53, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Info Templates added IMO--Lmbuga 15:47, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Statement is now there.  Thank you. --Augustgeyler 18:49, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Augustgeyler 09:15, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Prydniprovia_corvette_2012_G1.jpg

• Nomination Ukrainian Navy corvette Prydniprovia (U155). -- George Chernilevsky 07:50, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Good composition. Well described image. But level of detail in combination with low resolution makes it non-QI. --Augustgeyler 11:00, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment Good enough IMO. Image not downsampled, just cropped. Let discuss --George Chernilevsky 11:09, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment I see. But there is too less detail left due to this intense crop. Let's see what others think. --Augustgeyler 11:11, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Over the bar for me. Yes, low resolution, but still over the threshold and perfectly sharp. --Plozessor 07:28, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Per Plozessor. --Sebring12Hrs 17:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Sebring12Hrs 17:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Colombian_white-faced_capuchin_(Cebus_capucinus).jpg

• Nomination Colombian white-faced capuchin (Cebus capucinus) --Hobbyfotowiki 07:03, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:08, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Great expression, nice scene! But unfortunately the image is lacking sharpness and detail. --Augustgeyler 23:44, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Support good enough imho. --Smial 19:02, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Strong support It's not often that I love an imperfect image because of its apparent imperfection. I love this one, and at first glance it seems imperfect to me. Its imperfection is not in the sharpness or detail, IMO. Perhaps someone can explain why I like it so much (QI) and why it doesn't seem perfect to me. --Lmbuga 00:55, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Augustgeyler 08:48, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Bytom_Upper_Silesian_Museum_2021.jpg

• Nomination Bytom, Upper Silesian Museum --Gower 16:29, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 19:08, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not very sharp, and may be too dark. I would like to have more opinions. --Sebring12Hrs 19:53, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak support I like the composition and the quality of the image, but I do agree with Sebring12Hrs on the image being a bit too dark. --Wobbanight 15:13, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:20, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Chorzów_plebania_parafii_św._Marii_Magdaleny_2025.jpg

• Nomination Chorzów Stary, rectory --Gower 17:27, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:12, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good composition. But the image is lacking sharpness and has green chromatic aberration --Augustgeyler 21:14, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment Where is the chromatic aberration visible? --Wobbanight 15:15, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

• On the left edge of the building. --Augustgeyler 18:51, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Green chromatic aberration on the left side of the building. --Wobbanight 12:27, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:19, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Foggara_in_Timimoun_01.jpg

• Nomination Foggara in Timimoun, Algeria --Bgag 03:34, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment This seems tilted, probably the foggara is crooked in reality. Everything right from it is leaning out. --Plozessor 03:44, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Done Should be OK now. --Bgag 04:49, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 13:41, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose  Level of detail too low and lack of sharpness. --Augustgeyler 21:14, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Augustgeyler. --Sebring12Hrs 18:54, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Borderline sharpness. --Wobbanight 12:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Sebring12Hrs 18:54, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Dijon_-_Palais_des_Ducs_et_des_États_de_Bourgogne_-_05.jpg

• Nomination Dijon (Côte-d'Or, France) - Palace of the Dukes and Estates of Burgundy - Central courtyard, with the King's lodgings and Philip the Good tower in the background --Benjism89 07:24, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment Sorry but I don't like those blurred license plates. Other opinion ? --Sebring12Hrs 10:24, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment Assuming Sebring12Hrs is opposing so I can take this to CR --Benjism89 07:44, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Yes I should have decline ;) --Sebring12Hrs 19:50, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose A good image. I have nothing against blurring licence plates. But in this case the masking is done very inaccurately and should be improved. --Augustgeyler 22:05, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

  I don't have nothing against blurring licence plate too, but it should done better. --Sebring12Hrs 02:36, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Info OK, let me till Monday to fix this :) --Benji 11:56, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Done @Sebring12Hrs and Augustgeyler: New version uploaded with a more precise blurring. (and sorry Sebring12Hrs, I thought you opposed the principle of blurring plates, not the fact that I had done it quite quickly) --Benjism89 17:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

• Sorry but I'm not convinced. Could you try the process as you use for faces ? It would be far away better. --Sebring12Hrs 17:30, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

• In this same photo, we can see that you have blurred the faces in a way that makes it look much cleaner. --Sebring12Hrs 17:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

• I use exactly the same tool on my software for faces and license plates. I just get the "strength" parameter of this tool at a higher level on license plates : at the same distance, you need a lot more blur to make a plate unreadable than to to make a person unrecognizable --Benjism89 18:12, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

• The issue is not the intensity of the blurring on the number plates, but the inaccuracy and roughness of the area selection. The blurred area should be only as large as necessary to make the plate unreadable and should blend softly into the image. In the latest version, however, the blurred regions again have hard edges and are in some cases larger than the numbers themselves — in fact, sometimes larger than the entire number plate. --Augustgeyler 18:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Done Hope I understood it well this time --Benjism89 22:01, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Support – Great! --Augustgeyler 22:14, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Augustgeyler 22:14, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

File:2024_Polanica-Zdrój,_ul._Wojska_Polskiego_62.jpg

• Nomination 62 Wojska Polskiego Street in Polanica-Zdrój --Jacek Halicki 00:49, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Sorry, technically very good, but too much stuff in front of the house. --Plozessor 03:32, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment I disagree, please discuss, this is a historic house worth spotting and I had no opportunity to take a better shot. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

• Surely the picture is valuable and the house was "worth spotting", no one doubts that. But sometimes you can't take a QI due to the circumstances, still you should take the best picture you can get. Pfarrscheune Ebern is a similar example of mine - I took this picture of the historic building because we didn't have one in Commons, still I don't consider it QI (and thus didn't nominate it) because of the disturbing cars. --Plozessor 05:22, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:13, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose because of cars obscuring the building. Maybe the better description for the image is literally "Cars obscuring a historic house". It's a common problem for thousands of cultural heritage sites. They're worth shooting nethertheless, and these pictures could be very useful sometimes, but this is not the reason to promote them as a QI. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Support per Sebring12Hrs. --Wobbanight 15:17, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Per others. --Augustgeyler 18:52, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 18:52, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

File:ILA_2018,_Schönefeld_(1X7A5884).jpg

• Nomination Airbus A340 European Flight Lab signing ceremony during ILA Berlin Air Show 2018 --MB-one 11:24, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Wobbanight 17:06, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose The focus is on the plane and on the signing arm, whereas the face and the rest of the person are out of focus. Sorry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:28, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Support DoF could be higher but still over the bar for me. --Plozessor 05:26, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Robert. --Augustgeyler 10:46, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Support per Plozessor. Good enough in A4 print size. --Smial 18:25, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Robert Flogaus-Faust. --Sebring12Hrs 19:12, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → More votes?   --Sebring12Hrs 19:12, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

File:At_Brighton_2025_072_-_Volkswagen_T1.jpg

• Nomination Volkswagen T1, 64 VAN, in Brighton --Mike Peel 08:54, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:14, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose The person's face is visible, but the angle isn't very flattering. Good photo, but not high quality. --Túllio F 00:53, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
  • @Túllio F: I've blurred their face, does that help? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:36, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Augustgeyler 08:56, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

File:20221017_Wasserturm_Neu-Ulm_04.jpg

• Nomination View up at the water tower in Neu-Ulm --FlocciNivis 13:45, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment How about crop to make tower perfectly in the middle of the frame? --Gower 14:29, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment Too me QI after adding coordinates. --Milseburg 15:14, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support The category is specific for the monument, whose coordinates are given also on Wikidata.Good quality of the photogrtaphy. --Harlock81 14:31, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose The image is tilted cw. --Augustgeyler 22:07, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Augustgeyler 08:37, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Dijon_-_Palais_des_Ducs_et_des_États_de_Bourgogne_-_16.jpg

• Nomination Dijon (Côte-d'Or, France) - Palace of the Dukes and Estates of Burgundy - Bar courtyard --Benjism89 08:40, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:34, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Borderline sharpness and especially the left building looks distorted. --Augustgeyler 11:41, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Augustgeyler 10:55, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Historisches_Hauptgebäude_der_Montanuniversität_Leoben,_Juli_2025.jpg

• Nomination Main building of Montanuniversität Leoben, Leoben, Austria. --Aciarium 09:41, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:19, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very distorted due to heavy PC, looks like left side falls to the left, and right side falls to the right --Екатерина Борисова 03:26, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Katerina. --August (talk) 10:51, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I don't see any issue with PC. We ask for PC, and then it's decline because of heavy PC... I don't understand. Walls are straights and the buildings doesn't seems leaning at all or falling. --Sebring12Hrs 12:39, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

• We ask for PC, but why make PC so heavily that the building loses its natural appearance and looks like a broken toy? Everything is fine in moderation. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:57, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Image doesn't need PC. --Wobbanight 15:20, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --August (talk) 10:51, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Hydrangeas_from_Gniewoszów.jpg

• Nomination multicolored hydrangeas at the church of St. Michael the Archangel in GniewoszówEnglish: multicolored hydrangeas at the church of St. Michael the Archangel in Gniewoszów --Gower 17:23, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:30, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp and noisy IMO. --Екатерина Борисова 02:15, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak support The sharpness is borderline but OK, especially on the central part. --Augustgeyler 18:55, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --August (talk) 18:55, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

File:Tibetan_Sand-Plover_in_Bakkhali_September_2025_by_Tisha_Mukherjee_12.jpg

• Nomination Tibetan Sand-Plover (Anarhynchus atrifrons) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:59, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 08:08, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp enough for this size. Needs to be cropped. Centererd subject. --Lmbuga 11:10, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Acceptable.--Ermell 20:49, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Ermell 20:49, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Timetable (day 8 after nomination)

• Sun 30 Nov → Mon 08 Dec
• Mon 01 Dec → Tue 09 Dec
• Tue 02 Dec → Wed 10 Dec
• Wed 03 Dec → Thu 11 Dec
• Thu 04 Dec → Fri 12 Dec
• Fri 05 Dec → Sat 13 Dec
• Sat 06 Dec → Sun 14 Dec
• Sun 07 Dec → Mon 15 Dec
• Mon 08 Dec → Tue 16 Dec